Abstract
The article studies the issues of digital interaction between the court and the notary in the out of court conciliation procedures, which allows establishing new forms of protection of rights and legitimate interests of citizens and legal entities in resolving civil disputes. The author analyzes the possibilities of digital justice and derives the criteria for interaction between the notaries and the court when using mediation agreements concluded in a notarial form. The current state of the human rights activities of the electronic notary in certification of distance mediation agreements has been studied. The purpose of the article is to form an idea of new possibilities of the notary for notarizing remote mediation agreements and forming a promising platform for digital interaction between the notaries and the court, based on the analysis of legal acts and scientific sources. Among the methods applied are comparative legal, description, interpretation, and theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Private-scientific methods including legal-dogmatic, and the method of interpreting legal norms were also used. The study showed that the remote execution of mediation agreements that have the status of enforcement documents, in the context of the increasing influence of digital technologies on the human rights activities of the court and notaries, is gaining importance in protecting the rights of subjects of economic relations, which provides an opportunity to reduce the burden on the court and save costly resources to reach consensus in a legal conflict for shorter time.
Publisher
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Reference17 articles.
1. Begichev, A.V. (2015) Execution of human rights functions of notaries in the judicial process. Nauchnoe mnenie. 3-2, 35-41. (in Russian).
2. Begichev, A.V., Grebennikov, V.V. & Domanov, V.N. (2017) Human Rights Functions of Lawyers and Notaries as Civil Society Institutions in Russian Federation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education - IJESE. 12 (1), 79-86.
3. Branovitskiy, K. L. & Yarkov, V. V. (2021) Possible ways of the civil procedure transformation under digitalization and pandemic: predictive justice. Russian Law: education, practice, researches. (4), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.34076/2410_2709_2021_4_19 (in Russian).
4. Ermakova, E.P., Frolova, E.E. & Sitkareva, E.V. (2020) New Trends in Developing Alternative Ways to Resolve Financial Disputes. Journal of Politics and Law. 13 (3), 280-286. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v13n3p280
5. Ermakova, E. P. & Frolova, E. E. (2022) Using Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution. In: Inshakova A.O., Frolova E.E. (eds) Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Vol. 254. Springer, Singapore, pр. 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_11
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献