Priorities of federal and regional legal policy in the field of digitalization

Author:

Sokolov Alexander Yu.ORCID,Soldatkina Oksana L.ORCID

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the dynamics of social environment development and the need for the legal system to respond to the changes including digitalization of all types of communication that take place in society. The authors assert that with transformations caused by digitalization (especially in such legally and socially significant areas as lawmaking), spontaneous changes in legislation should be avoided. This principle formulated the purpose of the study - to identify the priorities of legal policy in the field of digitalization of lawmaking. To solve the tasks, the authors apply the methods of system analysis, formal logic, and synthesis. Based on the results of the study, the following conclusions have been obtained. The system of legal policy priorities allows to select the right means of its implementation, and the methodology of system analysis is well suited for prioritization. This methodology offers a scheme for optimizing legal regulation, on the basis of which the authors have identified the priorities of legal policy in the field of digitalization of lawmaking.

Publisher

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Arkhipov, V.V. & Naumov, V.B. (2017) On some issues of theoretical foundations for the development of legislation on robotics: aspects of will and legal personality. Law. (5), 157-170. (in Russian).

2. Bentley, J.L. (1982) Writing efficient programs. Prentice-Hall, Inc., USA.

3. Bentley, L.D. & Dittman, K.C. (2004) Systems analysis and design methods. Front McGraw-Hill Irwin.

4. Bundin, M., Martynov, A. & Minbaleev, A. (2021) Legal aspects of the use of biometric students' identification for distant and online learning: russian perspective. In: DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O'21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. рр. 564-566. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463758

5. Goloskokov, L.V. (2006) Theory of network law. Saint Petersburg, Legal Center Press Publ. (in Russian).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3