Mapping the Psychosocial: Introducing a Standardised System to Improve Psychosocial Understanding within Mental Health

Author:

Matthew Bretton Oakes

Abstract

Objective: Psychosocial approaches are increasingly being advocated as an efficacious means of addressing mental health problems. However, with a multitude of complex and varying interpretations present with the use of the term ‘psychosocial’ / ‘psycho-social’ in contemporary discussions of mental health, its application can be vague and even contradictory. This presents problems for research to inform practice and practice to inform research, ultimately inhibiting the help given to those suffering. Method: Literary review, reflecting an extended period of 10 years, explores and analyses the use of the terms ‘psychosocial’ and ‘psycho-social’ within a mental health context. Results: This article identifies that applications and use of the term psychosocial vary significantly, with two models being primarily evident in mental health applications: a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary model. Conclusion: A standardised system is established for mental health theorists and practitioners to identify and categorise these different applications. This outcome is intended to lead to a better understanding of different psychosocial applications, provide better communication between existing psychosocial applications, and improve clarity for future instruction.

Publisher

Heighten Science Publications Corporation

Reference45 articles.

1. 1. Paris J. Over Diagnosis in Psychiatry: How modern psychiatry lost its way while creating a diagnosis for almost all of life's misfortunes. Oxford University Press: UK. 2015.

2. 2. Walker S. Psychosocial Intervention in Mental Health Nursing. Sage Publications: UK. 2015.

3. 3. Bell R. [Public Health England] Psychosocial pathways and health outcomes: Informing action on health inequalities. PHE Publications. 2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/647709/Psychosocial_pathways_and_health_equity.pdf accessed 06/07/23.

4. 4. Trewin M, Linde K. Guidance on the support of mental health social workers working in NHS, independent or integrated services. NHS Health Education England. 2020. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Guidance%20on%20the%20support%20of%20mental%20health%20support%20workers.pdf Accessed 28.03.23

5. 5. Hayward R. The invention of the psychosocial: An introduction. Hist Human Sci. 2012 Dec;25(5):3-12. doi: 10.1177/0952695112471658. PMID: 23626408; PMCID: PMC3627511.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3