Author:
Shakuntala Chhabra,Naman Chhabda,Afreen S,Rathod M
Abstract
Background: Stillbirth (SB), either because of intrauterine or intrapartum fetal death, is amongst the most devastating pregnancy complications, hardest to predict, real challenge for health systems. India probably accounts for the highest SB numbers in the world. Objectives: A community-based prospective study was carried out to know the burden, and causes of SBs in rural women of remote regions. Material methods: After approval of the ethics committee of the Institute in Maharashtra for broader research, which was service-oriented, the present study was conducted in 100 villages around the village with health facilities. These villages were included keeping in mind future services. After obtaining the consent of women, information was prospectively recorded on their predesigned tool (which was for broader work), by asking women and seeing their records of antenatal and intranatal care on a regular basis. The study subjects were selected after obtaining information from nurse midwives, Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), and Aaganwadi workers. As the plan was to serve, there was excellent cooperation. The tool was made for broader work. Villages were visited 5 days a week. Study was community-based in villages in remote, hilly regions with various local issues so any information the women told and was in the record was used. Results: A total of 3905 births occurred over two years, 3635 (93%) term, and 270 (7%) preterm. Amongst 3635 term births, 3474 (95.6%) were live births, 161 (4.4%) SBs, amongst 270 preterm births, 239 (88.5%) were live births, 31 (11.5%) SBs. Of 192 SBs, 48 (7.2%) SBs were amongst 2690 women with anaemia, (16 (2.4%) SBs amongst women with very severe anaemia, 12 (1.8%) SBs were amongst 667 women with severe anaemia, 12 (1.8%) SBs were amongst 664 women with moderate anaemia, 8(1.2%) SBs were amongst 680 women with mild anaemia). Overall of 192 (4.9%) SBs, 31 (18.1%) SBs were among 517 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDsP) 8 (4.4%) SBs amongst 280 women with moderate HDsP, 12 (6.9%) SBs amongst 175 women with severe HDsP, 11 (6.8%) SBs in 62 women with eclampsia. Overall of 192 SBs, 6 (3.1%) babies had weight < 1 kg, 8 (4.1%) of ≥ 1 to < 1.5 kg, 50 (26.0%) ≥ 1.5 to < 2 kg, 64 (33.3%) ≥ 2 to < 2.5 kg, 64 (33.3%) 2.5 kg and more, obviously fewer babies more deaths in birth weight less than 1. 5 kg, more so less than 1 kg. Conclusion: Overall SBs were in women with disorders but 4.5% SBs did occur in women with no disorder. SBs were significantly higher amongst babies weighing less than 1 kg, beyond this weight, numbers were similar.
Publisher
Heighten Science Publications Corporation
Reference33 articles.
1. 1. Ghumare JP, Morey AP. Epidemiology of Stillbirth: A study in a tertiary care hospital located at a rural area of Northern Maharashtra, India. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research. 2016; 3(4):326-9.
2. 2. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, Hogan D, Shiekh S, Qureshi ZU, You D, Lawn JE; Lancet Stillbirth Epidemiology Investigator Group. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb; 4(2):e98-e108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Erratum in: Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Mar; 4(3):e164. PMID: 26795602.
3. 3. Sergi CM, Spencer D, Al-Jishi T. Stillbirth Investigations: An Iconographic and Concise Diagnostic Workup in Perinatal Pathology. J Lab Physicians. 2023 Apr 18; 15(4):475-487. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764485. PMID: 37780873; PMCID: PMC10539070.
4. 4. Skytte TB, Holm-Hansen CC, Ali SM, Ame S, Molenaar J, Greisen G, Poulsen A, Sorensen JL, Lund S. Risk factors of stillbirths in four district hospitals on Pemba Island, Tanzania: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 26; 23(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05613-6. PMID: 37101264; PMCID: PMC10131471.
5. 5. Kingdom JC, Audette MC, Hobson SR, Windrim RC, Morgen E. A placenta clinic approach to the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb