Abstract
An empirical framework that accurately describes radioactive bonding energies is the somewhat empirical mass equation (SEMF). They showcase many implementations and uses of the idea that rely on graphics and printed objects. A key new addition is a contrast with real experiments, as well as a visualization of the energy environment as supplied by the SEMF. The shortcomings of the empirical theory are shown by our visualization of this differential energy scenery, which also highlights the significance of what are known as magic numbers—an explanation provided by the outermost approach, which was developed much more recently than the water drop theory. This provides a great chance to talk about the advantages and limitations of simulations everywhere within the framework of science teaching.
Publisher
Heighten Science Publications Corporation
Reference28 articles.
1. 1. Ubben M, Heusler S. Gestalt and functionality as independent dimensions of mental models in science Res. Sci. Educ. 2019; 49:1-15.
2. 2. Ubben M, Heusler S. A haptic model of vibration modes in spherical geometry and its application in atomic physics, nuclear physics and beyond Eur. J. Phys. 2018; 39:045404.
3. 3. Martin BR, Shaw G. Nuclear and particle physics: an introduction. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2019. p. 62. ISBN 978-1-119-34462-9. OCLC 1078954632.
4. 4. Oregon State University. Nuclear masses and binding energy lesson 3. Oregon State University. cited 2015 Sep 30.
5. 5. Möller P. The limits of the nuclear chart set by fission and alpha decay. EPJ Web Conf. 2016; 131:03002:1-8. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201613103002.