Organ donation by children in Australia, 2000–2019: impact of the 2009 National Reform Program. A population‐based registry data study

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the impact of the 2009 National Reform Program for organ donation in Australia on the number and characteristics of organ donors under 16 years of age.Design, setting, participantsRetrospective observational time series study; analysis of Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation (ANZOD) registry data for all consented potential deceased organ donors under 16 years of age during 2000–2019, and of numbers of donors aged 16 years or more reported in ANZOD annual reports.Main outcome measuresDifference between 2000–2008 (pre‐reform) and 2009–2019 (reform period) in annual organ donor rates (donors per million population), by age group (under 16 years, 16 years or more), reported as incidence rate ratio (IRR). Secondary outcomes: Differences in child donor characteristics during 2000–2008 and 2009–2019.ResultsDuring 2000–2019, 400 children under 16 years of age were consented potential deceased organ donors, of whom 374 were actual deceased donors (94%): 146 during 2000–2008, 228 during 2009–2019. The median annual rate was 3.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0–4.3) actual donors per million population during 2000–2008 and 4.2 (IQR, 3.6–5.2) donors per million population during 2009–2019 (IRR, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93–1.42). In contrast, the difference between the two periods was statistically significant for donors aged 16 years or more, rising from 11.7 (IQR, 11.2–11.8) to 19.9 (IQR, 18.3–24.4) actual donors per million population (IRR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.66–1.85). The median age of actual organ donors under 16 was similar during 2000–2008 (11 years; IQR, 7–14 years) and 2009–2019 (10 years; IQR, 4–14 years), as was the proportion of donors in this age group under 10 kg (2000–2008: four of 146, 3%; 2009–2019: 14 of 228, 6%).ConclusionsDespite its overall effect on organ donation rates, the National Reform Program was not effective in increasing the numbers of donors under 16 years of age. Relying on broad initiatives for adult donors may not be appropriate for achieving this aim.