How should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health care? Recommendations from a citizens’ jury

Author:

Carter Stacy M12ORCID,Aquino Yves Saint James12ORCID,Carolan Lucy12ORCID,Frost Emma12ORCID,Degeling Chris12ORCID,Rogers Wendy A3ORCID,Scott Ian A45ORCID,Bell Katy JL6ORCID,Fabrianesi Belinda12ORCID,Magrabi Farah7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW

2. Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW

3. Macquarie University Sydney NSW

4. University of Queensland Brisbane QLD

5. Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane QLD

6. University of Sydney Sydney NSW

7. Australian Institute for Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney NSW

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo support a diverse sample of Australians to make recommendations about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in health care.Study designCitizens’ jury, deliberating the question: “Under which circumstances, if any, should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health systems to detect or diagnose disease?”Setting, participantsThirty Australian adults recruited by Sortition Foundation using random invitation and stratified selection to reflect population proportions by gender, age, ancestry, highest level of education, and residential location (state/territory; urban, regional, rural). The jury process took 18 days (16 March – 2 April 2023): fifteen days online and three days face‐to‐face in Sydney, where the jurors, both in small groups and together, were informed about and discussed the question, and developed recommendations with reasons. Jurors received extensive information: a printed handbook, online documents, and recorded presentations by four expert speakers. Jurors asked questions and received answers from the experts during the online period of the process, and during the first day of the face‐to‐face meeting.Main outcome measuresJury recommendations, with reasons.ResultsThe jurors recommended an overarching, independently governed charter and framework for health care AI. The other nine recommendation categories concerned balancing benefits and harms; fairness and bias; patients’ rights and choices; clinical governance and training; technical governance and standards; data governance and use; open source software; AI evaluation and assessment; and education and communication.ConclusionsThe deliberative process supported a nationally representative sample of citizens to construct recommendations about how AI in health care should be developed, used, and governed. Recommendations derived using such methods could guide clinicians, policy makers, AI researchers and developers, and health service users to develop approaches that ensure trustworthy and responsible use of this technology.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Reference24 articles.

1. Australian Department of Industry Science and Resources.Supporting responsible AI: discussion paper. Government's interim response. 17 Jan 2024.https://consult.industry.gov.au/supporting‐responsible‐ai(viewed Mar 2024).

2. More than algorithms: an analysis of safety events involving ML-enabled medical devices reported to the FDA

3. A roadmap for artificial intelligence in healthcare for Australia news;Wadie J.;Australian Alliance for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare,2021

4. We need to chat about artificial intelligence

5. Artificial intelligence and the clinical world: a view from the front line

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3