Affiliation:
1. Monash University Melbourne VIC
2. Alfred Health Melbourne VIC
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo determine the uptake of the Alfred Health Post‐COVID service among people hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) or referred by general practitioners; to describe their characteristics and symptoms at eight weeks and the clinical services they required.Study designObservational cohort study.SettingOutpatient post‐COVID‐19 follow‐up service in a tertiary Melbourne hospital.ParticipantsAll people admitted to Alfred Health (inpatients, hospital‐in‐the‐home) with COVID‐19, 19 March 2020 – 28 December 2022; people with persistent symptoms referred by general practitioners in the Alfred Health catchment area during 2022.InterventionQuestionnaire‐based symptom assessment eight weeks after onset of COVID‐19. Dyspnoea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress disorder were assessed with standardised tools, as were health status and health‐related quality of life; return to work or study, weight loss, and altered cognition and memory were also assessed. Screening was followed by physical assessment and management at the service (specialist general medicine review, physiotherapist, allied health assistant, neuropsychologist) and referral to other specialist medical services as required.Main outcome measuresProportion of eligible people who used the service for follow‐up at eight weeks; proportions of service users who reported symptoms and return to pre‐COVID‐19 employment or study; clinical services required by service users.ResultsOf 6712 people invited for screening, 726 completed questionnaires (11%). At least one persistent symptom was reported by 385 of 642 respondents (60% of respondents, 5.7% of invitees), most frequently memory (371 of 656, 57%) or concentration problems (431 of 656, 66%), dyspnoea (197 of 703, 28%), and extreme fatigue (189 of 673, 28%). Sixty‐seven of 453 respondents had not returned to pre‐COVID‐19 work or study (15%). People were referred to a variety of medical and non‐medical services for management, including specialist medical clinics, allied health, and rehabilitation. Among 71 people who also completed questionnaires at twelve months, the proportions who reported fatigue, anxiety, and memory and concentration changes were similar at both assessments.ConclusionsAfter acute COVID‐19 that required hospital admission or was followed by persistent symptoms in community care, a small proportion of people (5.7%) reported symptoms that required medical and allied health specialist assessment and management. Our findings may assist planning services for people with long COVID.
Reference14 articles.
1. Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records
2. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
3. Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID‐19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP‐ COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.;Evans R;Lancet Respir Med,2022
4. World Health Organization.A clinical case definition of post COVID‐19 condition by a Delphi consensus. 6 Oct 2021.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345824(viewed Apr 2023).
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP).COVID‐19 rapid guideline: managing the long‐term effects of COVID‐19 [NG188]. Updated 11 Nov 2021.https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188(viewed Apr 2023).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献