Importance of Cytological Screening in the Diagnosis of Cervical Diseases

Author:

Majidova N. B., ,Gurbanova C. F.,Gurbanova F. A., ,

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the conventional Pap smear with liquid-based cytology in the early diagnosis of cervical diseases. Materials and methods. The study included 150 women between the ages of 18 and 73 with cervical diseases. The comparison was held on the basis of the results of histology of liquid-based and conventional Pap smears taken from cervix. Bethesda classification was used to make the diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was calculated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results and discussion. During the sensitivity, specificity and prognostic assessment of liquid-based cytology with conventional Pap smears, the sensitivity of liquid-based cytology was higher than the conventional Pap test – 93.1%, and the conventional Pap test was 81.3%. The specificity of liquid-based cytology can be compared with a conventional Pap test (76.2% and 70.6%, respectively). The positive prognostic value was 84.4% in liquid-based cytology and 88.6% in the conventional Pap test. Negative prognostic value was significantly higher in liquid-based cytology than in conventional Pap tests (88.9% and 57.1%, respectively). The total diagnostic value was 86.0% in liquid-based cytology and 78.5% in the conventional Pap test. As a result of the study it has become clear that liquid-based cytology is an appropriate method for the diagnosis of cervical diseases. There are screening programs for cervical, breast, colorectal and prostate cancer in the country, but due to some psycho-social factors, restrictions and barriers, patients only seek medical attention when there is an urgent need. As a result, more than half of all cancers are diagnosed at a late stage. Thus, the study concluded that liquid-based cytology is more convenient than conventional smear screening for cervical cancer screening. As single-layer smears are easier to examine, cells with atypia are not covered by other cells (inflammation, blood, etc.). In addition, the amount of unsatisfactory smears is minimal. In general, many studies have been conducted comparing liquid-based cytology with conventional Pap smears. The results were different in both the initial studies and the meta-analysis. Conclusion. Thus, both screening methods predict the likelihood of disease in the same way, but with liquid-based cytology, the number of false-negative results is less, and the sample quality is improved by reducing the number of unsatisfactory smears. Also, women with liquid-based cytology are more likely to get a positive result than those with cervical disease. Liquid-based cytology is superior and more sensitive than conventional Pap tests in the detection of cervical neoplasms

Publisher

Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference16 articles.

1. Sultanova IF. Epidemiological situation and the problem of screening for uterine cancer in the world and in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan J Oncol. 2019;2:105-109.

2. Amiraslanov AT, Gaziyev AY. Oncology. Baku: Education; 2010. 912 p.

3. SGO 2018: New Evidences Recommend to revice Cervical Cancer-Based Screening Guidelines. Posted by ASCO; 03/29/2018.

4. Wiebea E, Dennyb L, Thomasa G. FIGO cancer report 2012,Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119:S100-S109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60023-X

5. Alvarez A, Marin J, Jover M, Fernandez R, Fradejas. M. Sensitivity of monoclonal antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 50, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 May;38(5):535-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148856

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3