Comparison of the Therapeutic Alliance Indicators according to the Results of the Survey of Cardiosurgical Patients and their Physical Therapists

Author:

Vitomskyi V. V., ,Al-Hawamdeh K. M.,Vitomska M. V.,Gavreliuk S. V.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine and compare the indicators of the therapeutic alliance based on the results of a survey of cardiac surgery patients and their physical therapists. Material and methods. The survey involved 100 patients (over 18 years old, without cognitive impairment) who underwent cardiac surgery. The Working Alliance Inventory questionnaire was used to assess the level of therapeutic alliance formation. The SF Hatcher Client form (which consists of 12 questions) was used for the patient. These questions were divided into three groups / domains: "goal items", "task items" and "bond items". The questionnaire was filled in on the seventh postoperative day. The SF Hatcher Client form, which consisted of 12 questions, was used for the patient. Intervention: before surgery, patients received a short consultation with a physical therapist regarding the goals and content of physical therapy, the algorithm for activation after surgery; the postoperative physical therapy protocol included early mobilization, therapeutic gymnastics, the use of respiratory physical therapy techniques, and therapeutic walking under the supervision of a physical therapist. Patients were provided with information and tasks on therapeutic walking, a small set of therapeutic exercises and breathing physical therapy for independent implementation. Results and discussion. The indicators of the therapeutic alliance between physical therapists and cardiac surgery patients confirmed its high level, both according to the results of the questionnaire survey of patients and the results of the survey of specialists. The "goal items" domain had the highest score in the patient's assessment of therapeutic alliance. Since the patient and specialist questionnaires had a different number of questions and a different maximum score, it was decided to make comparisons of the overall estimates of the level of therapeutic alliance after converting them to a percentage of the maximum. A significantly better overall score for the therapeutic alliance was established according to the results of the questionnaire survey of physical therapists: 87.5 (82.5; 95) % of the maximum versus 81.25 (66.67; 89.58) % of the maximum (p = 0.000). Conclusion. Physical therapists rated the therapeutic alliance for a higher score

Publisher

Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3