Author:
Gadalov V. N.,Gubanov O. M.,Filonovich A. V.,Vornacheva I. V.
Abstract
A method is proposed for identifying the size of defects during eddy testing, which reduces the zones of uncertainty caused by errors in calculation and experiment. In order to reduce the uncertainty, as a criterion for comparing the theoretical and experimental dependences of the signal on the defect, one can use the difference in minimization of the squares of the deviation of the corresponding dependences. Using the method of simulating the signal of an eddy current transducer (ECP) from a defect, experiments were carried out in order to verify the method for identifying a characteristic size, a defect, with subsequent calculation of the customer’s risk.
Publisher
Izdatel'skii dom Spektr, LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. Koppenfel's V., Shtal'man F. (1963). Practice of conformal mappings. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoy literatury. [in Russian language]
2. Klyuev V. V. (Ed.), Sosnin F. R., Kovalev A. V. (2003). Non-destructive testing and technical diagnostics: handbook. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. [in Russian language]
3. Klyuev V. V. (Ed.), Fedosenko Yu. K., Shkatov P. N., Efimov A. G. (2014). Vortex control: textbook for training specialists in non-destructive testing and technical diagnostics. Moscow: ID «Spektr». [in Russian language]
4. Shubochkin A. E., Efimov A. G. (2014). Modern trends of eddy current flaw detection and defectometry. Kontrol'. Diagnostika, (3), pp. 68 – 73. [in Russian language] DOI 10.14489/td.2014.03.pp.068-072
5. Bobrov A. L., Vlasov K. V., Bekher S. A. (2019). Fundamentals of eddy current nondestructive testing: a textbook. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo SGUPSa. [in Russian language]
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献