USING EXPERT REVIEW METHODS TO SELECT TRUE CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATION COLLABORATIONS

Abstract

The purpose of the scientific work is to assess the quality of a set of scientometric indicators to determine the degree of truth of publication scientific collaborations. The paper presents the definition of a publication collaboration of scientists. The main types of collaborations are described: true and false. A list of external and internal alternatives (indicators) for their assessment has been formed. As an analysis of the system for evaluating scientific activity, a ninescreen diagram of the system for evaluating activities in the field of publication activity of the FSBEI HE “Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University” (NMSTU). From the analysis of the scheme, it can be seen that today there is a traditional system for evaluating publication collaborations. It has been determined that the existing system for assessing the degree of truth of publication collaborations must be supplemented with decisionmaking scenarios and an updated list of indicators for assessing links between the authors of scientific papers. For this, a group of experts (heads of scientific and educational organizations) was selected, who formed a list of external and internal alternatives (indicators) to assess the truth of publication collaborations of scientists of a higher educational institution. For the reliability of the results of the formation of the list of alternatives, it was decided that it was necessary to assess the competence and consistency of experts. The list of external alternatives for evaluating the validity of publication collaborations was used as the initial data for peer review. Coefficients were calculated to assess competence and consistency. It is concluded that the generated list of external alternatives is considered qualitative for assessing the degree of truth of publication collaborations.