[en] Exploring safety and agency in social media: a case study of online crossdressing

Author:

Boneta Nerea,Fuentes AnitaORCID

Abstract

Introduction. Are there safe spaces for the construction of online communities with diverse gender identities and sexual desires? What makes some online spaces safer than others? And for whom? Does the architecture of these spaces influence the ways in which users navigate the Internet? Methodology. To address these questions, we conducted a digital ethnography on a social media platform oriented towards the Spanish-speaking crossdresser community. Findings and analysis. Our analysis suggests that this platform acts as a digital counterpublic, as it allows users to inhabit a safe environment for self-expression, building support networks, organizing as a collective, and articulating their sexual intimacies. Based on these findings, we infer that online safety and agency are closely interrelated, the latter being a result of the first. In addition, we found that the concept of online safety should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the feminist perspective, where online safety is always construed in a situated manner and conceives the subjects of study as active agents involved in the definition of the concept itself. Ethical considerations. The research process raised ethical questions of great relevance to the conclusions of this study, suggesting that the same factors to be considered when conducting research in digital platforms should be contemplated when designing and navigating online safe spaces. We thus propose that, both in carrying out online qualitative research and in the construction of online safe spaces, the following aspects should be taken into consideration: the implications of the privacy settings offered by the platform, the vulnerability of the users that populate it, the sensitivity of the topics covered by the platform’s community and, last but not least, an ongoing negotiation and reaffirmation of consent in the utilization of the users’ personal data.

Publisher

Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)

Reference45 articles.

1. Abu‐Lughod, L. (1990). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 5(1), pp. 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07407709008571138

2. Ardèvol, E., Beltrán, M., Callén, B. y Pérez, C. (2003). Etnografía virtualizada. La observación participante y la entrevista semiestructurada en línea. Athenea Digital: Revista de Pensamiento e Investigación Social, 3, (pp. 72-92). https://acortar.link/hzAIt

3. Barbé i Serra, A. (2015). El cross-dressing en el context catalàn del segle XXI. Tesis doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona, Cataluña. Http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/96198

4. boyd, d. (2011). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics. In Z, Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.

5. Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.), (2010). Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research. Taylor & Francis.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3