'Business as usual': The Treaty of Lisbon and transnational party manifestos

Author:

Ares Cristina,Volkens Andrea

Abstract

The Treaty of Lisbon was a milestone in the enduring process of empowerment of the European Parliament and its connections to the European Commission. This latest reform of the Treaties, in force since December 2009, placed the only supranational institution whose members are directly elected by all citizens of the EU (since 1979) on an equal footing with the Council as a co-legislator in around thirty additional policy areas. The Treaty of Lisbon also strengthened the European Parliament in terms of the annual and multiannual budgetary decisions, and it granted it the right to elect the President of the European Commission according to the results of the European elections. This article examines various possible effects of this major boost of the European Parliament, along with links to the European Commission in the manifestos issued by five European parties: the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), European Free Alliance (EFA), European Green Party (European Greens or EGP), European People’s Party (EPP), and Party of European Socialists (PES). It studies variations from 2004 onwards in the scope of the programmatic proposals regarding EU domains of power, the footprint in the manifestos of the transnational party organisations themselves, and eventually also of their candidates for the presidency of the European Commission. To do so, the twenty manifestos issued by the abovementioned parties for the 2004, 2009, 2014 and 2019 European elections were content analysed. The results point to the lasting distance between these transnational parties and the European elections, despite the reinforcement of the role of the European Parliament over time.

Publisher

Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Ares, C. and L. Bouza (2019): “Introducción: crisis, continuidad y cambio en la UE”, in C. Ares and L. Bouza, eds., Política de la UE: crisis y continuidad, Madrid, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, pp. 7-16.

2. Arregui, J. (2019): “Procedimientos legislativos, policy-making y resultados políticos en la Unión Europea”, in C. Ares and L. Bouza, eds., Política de la UE: crisis y continuidad, Madrid, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, pp. 41-64.

3. Bardi, L., E. Bressanelli, E. Calossi, W. Gagatek, P. Mair, and E. Pizzimenti (2010): How to create a Transnational Party System, study requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO Committee), available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/15676/EUDOReport2010_02.pdf?sequence=1.

4. Bauer, M. W. and S. Becker (2014): “The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance”, Journal of European Integration, 36 (3), pp. 213–229, doi: 10.1080/07036337.2014.885750.

5. Belot, C., B. Cautrès and S. Strudel (2012): “Europe as a polarising issue”, Revue française de science politique, 63, pp. 1081-1112, doi: 10.3917/rfsp.636.1081.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3