Author:
Peña-Cervel María Sandra,Rosca Andreea
Abstract
This paper provides evidence of the fruitfulness of combining analytical categories from Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis for the analysis of complex literary characterizations. It does so through a detailed study of the “tributes”, i.e. the randomly selected children who have to fight to death in a nationally televised show, in The Hunger Games. The study proves the effectiveness of such categories to provide an analytically accurate picture of the dystopian world depicted in the novel, which is revealed to include a paradoxical element of hope. The type of dehumanization that characterizes the dystopian society of Panem is portrayed through an internally consistent set of ontological metaphors which project negative aspects of lower forms of existence onto people. This selection of metaphors promotes a biased perspective on the poor inhabitants of Panem, while legitimizing the social inequalities the wealthy Capitol works hard to immortalize. However, Katniss undergoes a metamorphosis through her discovery of her own identity, which hints at an emerging female empowerment. This transformation, together with her identification with the Mockingjay, a supernatural being that voices her beliefs and emotions, contributes to disrupting the status quo imposed by the almighty Gamemakers and to purveying a message of optimism.
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference55 articles.
1. Barcelona, A. 2015. Metonymy. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 143-166.
2. Barlow, M. 1997. Image schemas and collocational patterns. Paper presented at the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, July 14-19, 1997. Amsterdam.
3. Barreras Gómez, M.A. 2015. The DIVIDED SELF metaphor: A cognitive-linguistic study of two poems by Nabokov. International Journal of English Studies 15(1): 97-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/1/211121
4. Brdar, M. 2017. Metonymy and Word-Formation. Their Interactions and Complementation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
5. Brône, G. & J. Vandaele (eds.). 2009. Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.