Abstract
This paper presents in non-technical language an interpretation of the argument of The General Theory, which is the importance of effective demand and its relation to human agency. It argues that The General Theory is not only a treatise on economic theory, but also, and more importantly, a treatise on methodology, i.e. how economists should reason when dealing with the complexity of the real world. Implicit in this analysis is a distinct position on the remit of the economist and the nature of economic advice and policy. This interpretation suggests that this understanding forms a new paradigm of thinking about the economy at large, centred around the concept of uncertainty. This insight developed into a new analytical tradition in economics, the Post Keynesian School of economic thought that sees uncertainty and effective demand as the key analytical long term concepts for understanding how the economy evolves through time.
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Reference49 articles.
1. Al-Amoudi, I., J. Latsis, 2014, “The arbitrariness and normativity of social conventions”, The British Journal of Sociology, 65(2), 358-378. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12042
2. Chick, V., 1983, Macroeconomics After Keynes. A Reconsideration of the General Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Cord, R., 2007, Keynes, London: Haus
4. Clarke, P., 2009, Keynes. The Twentieth Century's Most Influential Economist. London: Bloomsbury.
5. Davidson, P., 1991, “Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 129-143. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.129
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Pasinetti on The Cambridge Keynesians;Contributions to Political Economy;2024-01-09