Abstract
This paper analyses the military use of holy relics, images, and other Christian apotropaic devices in the Roman-Persian wars. I examine a wide range of literary evidence from the 4th to the 7th century exploring where, why, and how different Christian objects were used in military contexts. Moreover, I consider different factors, as the local religious practices or the rivalry between the Christian Roman Empire and Zoroastrian Persia. I argue that the earliest military uses of relics and holy images happened in the context of the Roman-Persian conflict and frontier region, and that, during the 4th-7th centuries, these uses were much more common there than anywhere else. Also, that some local practices of this region could have been adopted by military officers and the Imperial elite. I propose that three factors could explain this: First, the intensity of the cult of relics and images in Syria and the Near East. Second, the growing identification of the Roman Empire as a Christian power between the 4th and 7th centuries. Finally, the Roman-Persian conflict and the climate of religious confrontation that grew over the course of the Byzantine-Sassanian wars.
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Religious studies,History,Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Reference77 articles.
1. Alexander, Suzanne Spain. “Heraclius, Byzantine Imperial Ideology, and the David Plates”. Speculum 52, no. 2 (1977): 217-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2850511.
2. Baert, Barbara. A Heritage of Holy Wood: The Legend of the True Cross in Text and Image. Leiden: Brill, 2004.
3. Barasch, Moshe. Icon: Studies in the History of an Idea. New York: New York University Press, 1992.
4. Barber, Charles. Figure and Likeness: On the Limits of Representation in Byzantine Iconoclasm. Princeton: Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.
5. Bardill, Jonathan. Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.