1. Batanero, C., Contreras, J. M., Díaz, C., & Sánchez, E. (2015). Prospective teachers’ semiotic conflicts in computing probabilities from a two-way table. Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3-16.
2. Chapman. O. (2014). Overall commentary: understanding and changing mathematics teachers. In J.–J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research Trends in Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 295-309). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
3. Cobb, P., Jackson, K., & Dunlap, C. (2016). Design Research: An Analysis and Critique. In L. D. English, & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 481-503). New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Cohen, S. (2004). Teachers’ professional development and the elementary mathematics classroom: Bringing understandings to light. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. D’Amore, B., Font, V., & Godino, J. D. (2007). La dimensión metadidáctica en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Paradigma, 28(2), 49-77.