Author:
Tsokanos Dimitrios,Ibáñez José R.
Abstract
Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Black Cat” has received a great deal of scholarly attention over the years from a variety of perspectives, not least the domestic and symbolic presence of Pluto in the story. Kent Ljungquist (1980) saw Poe’s narrative in terms of classical literary tradition, specifically the notion of the daemonic, yet confined his study to Pluto’s demonic features, arguing that the cat may be an infernal spirit sent to castigate the narrator. Other studies, such as Clark Moreland and Karime Rodriguez (2015), have reached similar conclusions. However, there is a surprising absence in the literature of any discussion of Poe’s decision to name the ‘phantasm’ of his narrative after the Hellenic god of the Underworld. The present paper seeks to address this, and proposes that Poe’s Pluto may not simply function as a demonic spirit, but rather as the Pluto of Hellenic mythology himself.
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Reference32 articles.
1. Amper, Susan (1992). Untold story: The lying narrator in “The Black Cat”. Studies in Short Fiction29: 475.
2. Anonymous (1833). A Classical Manual Being a Mythological, Historical, and Geographical Commentary on Pope’s Homer and Dryden”s Aeneid of Virgil: With a Copious Index. London: J. Murray.
3. Badenhausen, Richard (1992). Fear and Trembling in Literature of the Fantastic: Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Black Cat”. Studies in Short Fiction29: 488.
4. Benton, Richard (1967). Platonic Allegory in Poe’s “Eleonora”. Nineteenth-Century Fiction22: 293-297.
5. Bolt, Peter G. (2003). Jesus’ Defeat of Death: Persuading Mark’s Early Readers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. “The Black Cat” and Emmanuel Rhoides;The Edgar Allan Poe Review;2021-11-01