Abstract
Introduction. Funded under the Horizon 2020 programme, the CHANGE project –Challenging Gender (In)Equality in Science and Research– aims to create and implement tailor-made gender equality plans (GEPs) in research performing organisations (RPOs). To make GEPs more sustainable, efforts are being made to stimulate institutional cultural change towards gender equal work environments and foster the gender dimension and inclusive research and innovation programmes in research funding organisations (RFOs) as well. The promotion of a gender equality culture is thus a key requirement for RPOs to maximise their potential. The CHANGE consortium is composed of seven institutions from six countries –Austria, Germany, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Israel– of which five are GEP implementing partners and two are experienced partners (one coordinator and one internal evaluator). Objectives and Methodology. This paper approaches the methodology of the project and the structural and cultural challenges faced by the implementing partners so far, looking more specifically to the similarities and differences in the different national and institutional contexts. Results and Discussion. In all the five implementing partners organisations, successful steps have been taken in the implementation of GEPs. Regardless of these first successes, even with increasing women’s representation in management and decision-making positions in some specific cases, implementing partners and coordinators fear that this change may be merely circumstantial or only due and during the project duration. Contribution. The challenges and barriers faced so far to stimulate institutional and cultural change towards gender equal work environments in RPOs are diverse. While there are important social, cultural, and institutional differences among the partner institutions, there is a great similarity in the difficulties faced in implementing GEPs. Resistances and challenges that emerge during processes of change when gender equality policies are implemented in RPOs are more transversal to different national and organisational contexts than one could expect.
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Reference29 articles.
1. Aiston, Sarah Jane and Jung, Jisun. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617.
2. Antoniou, Alexander-Stamatios and Apergi, M. (2019). Gender and leadership in education. In Alexander-Stamatios Antoniou; Cooper, Cary & Gatrell, Caroline (Eds.): Women, Business and Leadership: Gender and Organisations (94-105). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
3. Bleijenbergh, Inge (2018). Transformational Change towards Gender Equality: An Autobiographical Reflection on Resistance during Participatory Action Research. Organization, 25(1), 131–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417726547
4. COM – European Commission (2019). The European Research Area: advancing together the Europe of research and innovation. Brussels: European Union.
5. COM – European Commission (2020). A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. Towards a Gender Equal Europe. Brussels: European Union.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献