Abstract
The central part of this article deals with the morality of secession. We present the three main "pure" theories about the morality of secession and suggest the greatest justifying power of an "impure" or mixed theory. At the same time, however, we advocate the need for a proper understanding of the question of the morality of secession. More specifically, we suggest that the best way to raise it is by introducing the notion of "reasonableness" into the question itself.
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Reference38 articles.
1. Arteta, Mikel (2015). Por qué es antidemocrática la secesión [Why secession is antidemocratic]. Revista de Filosofía, 40:1, 157-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RESF.2015.v40.n1.48444
2. Bauböck, Rainer (1999). Why Secession is not like divorce. In K. Goldman et al. (eds.), Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post-Cold-War Era. UCL.
3. Beran, Harry (1984). A Liberal Theory of Secession, Political Studies, 32:1. 21-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1984.tb00163.x
4. Bossacoma, Pau (2020). Morality and Legality of Secession: A Theory of National Self-Determination. Palgrave MacMillan.
5. Buchanan, Allen (1991). Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Westview.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献