Abstract
Today, the activities of military units become especially important in conditions of instability in the country. Consequently, the study of the psychological characteristics of such people becomes expedient. Modern types of combat are requirements that often exceed the capabilities and resources of the military. This, in turn, creates a need for a special type of personality - stable, socially active, with a high level of self-regulation and the ability to withstand pressure from adverse factors [9].In modern psychology, the individual way in which a person can cope with a complex, crisis situation is determined by the concept of coping behavior. The study of this concept is especially relevant for persons working in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Coping is a strategy of behavior in complex stressful situations, which is chosen by servicemen to deal with stress. This is a kind of response of the psyche, which is an adaptive mechanism at the time of negative impact. The choice of coping strategies is determined by a number of personality traits that determine the dominant pattern of behavior of a particular serviceman during decompression.
Reference9 articles.
1. Aleksandrova L. A. (2008).Sviaz mekhanyzmov psykholohycheskykh zashchyt y sovladanyia s aktsentuatsyiamy kharaktera, typom temperamenta, эmotsyonalnoi kompetentnostiu y ahressyvnostiu [The relationship between the mechanisms of psychological defenses and coping with character accentuations, type of temperament, emotional competence and aggressiveness]/ Vestnyk Kemerovskoho hosudarstvennoho unyversyteta. Seryia «Psykholohyia» - Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University. Series "Psychology", № 4. 75-83. [In Russian].
2. Chen, G.-M. (1992) Communication Adaptability and Interaction Involvement as Predictors of Cross-Cultural Adjustment. Communication Research Reports, 9 (1), pp. 33-41. doi:10.1080/08824099209359895
3. Billings A.G., Moos R.H. Coping, stress and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. J. Pers and Soc. Psychol. 2013. Vol. 46, рр.877–891.
4. Clark K., and C. Bormann, Cropanzano, R., James K. (1995) Validation evidence for three coping measures. Journal of Personality Assessment. 65, 434–455.
5. Harvey, M., Speier, C., Novecevic, M.M./ (2001) A theory-based framework for strategic global human resource staffing policies and practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12 (6), pp. 898-915. doi:10.1080/09585190122394