CONCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE IN THE DOMAIN OF DIGITAL DEMOCRACY

Author:

Vephkhvia Grigalashvili

Abstract

Further development of the domain of electronic (digital) democracy, which represents the result of implementation of electronic government and electronic governance, and implies the smart use of digital tools, substantially depends on how correctly is defined their conceptual dimensions and determined their functional purposes. E-government and E-governance (as terms and concepts), known as multidimensional, multifaceted and multidisciplinary phenomenon, are often treated as synonymous and used interchangeably in the academic literature or formal documents. Therefore it is becoming increasingly difficult to set a common definition (Roy, 2003) or clear existing conceptual ambiguity between them. There is no universally accepted definition of both abstractions. Such conceptual uncertainty has a negative impact on the development of digital democracy. The research objective of this article is to provide a deeper understanding of e-government and e-governance concepts through empirical studies and scatter the existing ambiguity in differences between these two concepts as this variety is not just questions of academic nuance. Based on a comparative analysis of e-government and e-governance definitions and conceptual meanings, this article offers an approach according to which e-government and e-governance represents two various but closely related and co-existing concepts. Furthermore, in the concluding section of the article, there are suggested recommendations regarding development a new grand term or concept in which both multidimensional conceptual visions will be combined.

Publisher

RS Global Sp. z O.O.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference98 articles.

1. Anttiroiko A.V. (2007). Democratic e-Governance – Basic Concepts, Issues and Future Trends. Digest of Electronic Government Policy and Regulation 30, 83–90, IOS Press

2. As-Saber, S. N. & Hossain, K. (2008). Call Centres and Their Role in E-governance: A Developing Country Perspective, The Journal of Community Informatics, Vol. 4, No 3

3. Backus, M. (2001) E-Governance and Developing Countries, Introduction and examples, Research Report, No. 3, April 2001

4. Bekkers, V., Dijkstra, G.; Edwards, A. and Fenger, M. (eds.) (2007). Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices, Hants: Ashgate Publishing. von Bergmann-Winberg, M-L. and Wihlborg, E. (2011). Entreprenörer i politikens gränsland och nätverk in: M-L von Bergmann-Winberg and E. Wihlborg (eds.) Politikens entreprenörskap – kreativ problemlösning och förändring, Malmö: Liber, 5-15

5. Bannister, F. and Walsh, N. (2002), The virtual public servant: Ireland's public services broker. InformationPolity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 7 (2/3)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3