Abstract
Pastures dedicated to cattle production in Venezuela have a low crude protein concentration. One of the nutritional strategies to correct the forage protein deficit is using non-protein nitrogen in the diet. To evaluate the effect of two non-protein nitrogen sources on the metabolic profile of lactating dairy cows, 31 F1 Holstein × Zebu multiparous cows averaging 419 ± 46 kg body weight and 17.1 ± 3.3 kg milk·animal·d-1 were randomly assigned to two treatments for 91 days: 1) 59 g·animal-1·d-1 of urea and 2) 64 g·animal-1·d-1 of Optigen II® as slow-release urea (SRU). The animals were grazing (2.12 AU·ha-1) on Urochloa decumbens, U. humidicola, and U. brizantha (7.98-9.61 % CP) and supplied with 4 kg·animal·d-1 of concentrate (15 % CP), and 108, 60, and 108 g·animal·d-1 of mineral, molasses, and bypass fat, respectively. Glucose, total protein, albumin, cholesterol, urea, and β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations, aspartate aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase activities were determined in blood serum samples every 28 days. ANOVA analyzed data in a completely randomized design with repeated measures. There were no differences among treatments in the parameters investigated; however, collecting time influenced all of them. No treatment × time interactions were found except for albumin concentration, higher in urea at day 0. The results indicate that under the conditions assayed in the present work, Optigen II® offers no advantage over urea concerning blood indicators of energy and protein metabolism and hepatic functionality in dairy cows.
Publisher
Corporacion Colombiana de Investigacion Agropecuaria (Corpoica)
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences