A prospective randomized trial examining health care utilization in individuals using multiple smartphone-enabled biosensors

Author:

Bloss Cinnamon S.1,Wineinger Nathan E.1,Peters Melissa1,Boeldt Debra L.1,Ariniello Lauren1,Kim Ju Young2,Sheard Judith1,Komatireddy Ravi1,Barrett Paddy1,Topol Eric J.134

Affiliation:

1. Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, California, United States

2. Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

3. Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States

4. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Scripps Health, San Diego

Abstract

Background.Mobile health and digital medicine technologies are becoming increasingly used by individuals with common, chronic diseases to monitor their health. Numerous devices, sensors, and apps are available to patients and consumers–some of which have been shown to lead to improved health management and health outcomes. However, no randomized controlled trials have been conducted which examine health care costs, and most have failed to provide study participants with a truly comprehensive monitoring system.Methods.We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of adults who had submitted a 2012 health insurance claim associated with hypertension, diabetes, and/or cardiac arrhythmia. The intervention involved receipt of one or more mobile devices that corresponded to their condition(s) (hypertension: Withings Blood Pressure Monitor; diabetes: Sanofi iBGStar Blood Glucose Meter; arrhythmia: AliveCor Mobile ECG) and an iPhone with linked tracking applications for a period of 6 months; the control group received a standard disease management program. Moreover, intervention study participants received access to an online health management system which provided participants detailed device tracking information over the course of the study. This was a monitoring system designed by leveraging collaborations with device manufacturers, a connected health leader, health care provider, and employee wellness program–making it both unique and inclusive. We hypothesized that health resource utilization with respect to health insurance claims may be influenced by the monitoring intervention. We also examined health-self management.Results & Conclusions.There was little evidence of differences in health care costs or utilization as a result of the intervention. Furthermore, we found evidence that the control and intervention groups were equivalent with respect to most health care utilization outcomes. This result suggests there are not large short-term increases or decreases in health care costs or utilization associated with monitoring chronic health conditions using mobile health or digital medicine technologies. Among secondary outcomes there was some evidence of improvement in health self-management which was characterized by a decrease in the propensity to view health status as due to chance factors in the intervention group.

Funder

NIH/NCATS flagship Clinical and Translational Science Award Grant

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference26 articles.

1. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014 estimates of diabetes and its burden in the epidemiologic estimation methods;American Diabetes Association;National Diabetes Statistics Report,2014

2. How consumers and physicians view new medical technology: comparative survey;Boeldt;Journal of medical Internet research,2015

3. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure;Chobanian;Hypertension,2003

4. Expenditures for hypertension among adults age 18 and older, 2010: estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population April 2013;Davis,2013

5. Comparative antihypertensive effects of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone on ambulatory and office blood pressure;Ernst;Hypertension,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3