healthcareCOVID: a national cross-sectional observational study identifying risk factors for developing suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in UK healthcare workers

Author:

Kua Justin12ORCID,Patel Reshma12,Nurmi Eveliina3,Tian Sarah4,Gill Harpreet4,Wong Danny J.N.24ORCID,Moorley Calvin5ORCID,Nepogodiev Dmitri6ORCID,Ahmad Imran47,El-Boghdadly Kariem47ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Targeted Intervention, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom

2. Health Services Research Centre, National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK

3. Department of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

4. Department of Anaesthesia, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

5. School of Health and Social Care/Adult Nursing & Midwifery Studies, London South Bank University, London, UK

6. National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

7. King’s College London, University of London, London, UK

Abstract

Objective To establish the prevalence, risk factors and implications of suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom (UK). Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting UK-based primary and secondary care. Participants Healthcare workers aged ≥18 years working between 1 February and 25 May 2020. Main outcome measures A composite endpoint of laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, or self-isolation or hospitalisation due to suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Results Of 6,152 eligible responses, the composite endpoint was present in 1,806 (29.4%) healthcare workers, of whom 49 (0.8%) were hospitalised, 459 (7.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 1,776 (28.9%) reported self-isolation. Overall, between 11,870 and 21,158 days of self-isolation were required by the cohort, equalling approximately 71 to 127 working days lost per 1,000 working days. The strongest risk factor associated with the presence of the primary composite endpoint was increasing frequency of contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases without adequate personal protective equipment (PPE): ‘Never’ (reference), ‘Rarely’ (adjusted odds ratio 1.06, (95% confidence interval: [0.87–1.29])), ‘Sometimes’ (1.7 [1.37–2.10]), ‘Often’ (1.84 [1.28–2.63]), ‘Always’ (2.93, [1.75–5.06]). Additionally, several comorbidities (cancer, respiratory disease, and obesity); working in a ‘doctors’ role; using public transportation for work; regular contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients; and lack of PPE were also associated with the presence of the primary endpoint. A total of 1,382 (22.5%) healthcare workers reported lacking access to PPE items while having clinical contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases. Conclusions Suspected or confirmed COVID-19 was more common in healthcare workers than in the general population and is associated with significant workforce implications. Risk factors included inadequate PPE, which was reported by nearly a quarter of healthcare workers. Governments and policymakers must ensure adequate PPE is available as well as developing strategies to mitigate risk for high-risk healthcare workers during future COVID-19 waves.

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference41 articles.

1. Black, asian and minority ethnic groups in England are at increased risk of death from COVID-19: indirect standardisation of NHS mortality data;Aldridge;Wellcome Open Research,2020

2. UK among highest COVID-19 health worker deaths in the world;Amnesty International UK,2020

3. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the U.S;CDC,2020

4. Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic: a narrative review;Cook;Anaesthesia,2020

5. COVID-19 policy tracker;Dunn,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3