Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies

Author:

Orben Rachael A.1,Fleishman Abram B.2,Borker Abraham L.3,Bridgeland William4,Gladics Amanda J.15,Porquez Jessica1,Sanzenbacher Peter67,Stephensen Shawn W.4,Swift Roberta8,McKown Matthew W.2,Suryan Robert M.19

Affiliation:

1. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, United States of America

2. Conservation Metrics, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America

3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America

4. Oregon Coast National Wildlife Refuge Complex, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newport, OR, United States of America

5. Oregon Sea Grant, Oregon State University—Extension Service, Astoria, OR, United States of America

6. ABR, Inc.—Environmental Research & Services, Fairbanks, AK, United States of America

7. Region 8—U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Palm Springs, CA, United States of America

8. Region 1—Migratory Birds and Habitat Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, United States of America

9. Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auk Bay Laboratories, Ted Steven’s Marine Research Institute, National Oceanographic Atmospheric Administration Fisheries, Juneau, AK, United States of America

Abstract

Seabirds are integral components of marine ecosystems and, with many populations globally threatened, there is a critical need for effective and scalable seabird monitoring strategies. Many seabird species nest in burrows, which can make traditional monitoring methods costly, infeasible, or damaging to nesting habitats. Traditional burrow occupancy surveys, where possible, can occur infrequently and therefore lead to an incomplete understanding of population trends. For example, in Oregon, during the last three decades there have been large changes in the abundance of Leach’s storm-petrels (Hydrobates leucorhoa), which included drastic declines at some colonies. Unfortunately, traditional monitoring failed to capture the timing and magnitude of change, limiting managers’ ability to determine causes of the decline and curtailing management options. New, easily repeatable methods of quantifying relative abundance are needed. For this study, we tested three methods of remote monitoring: passive acoustic monitoring, time-lapse cameras, and radar. Abundance indices derived from acoustics and imagery: call rates, acoustic energy, and counts were significantly related to traditional estimates of burrow occupancy of Leach’s storm-petrels. Due to sampling limitations, we were unable to compare radar to burrow occupancy. Image counts were significantly correlated with all other indices, including radar, while indices derived from acoustics and radar were not correlated. Acoustic data likely reflect different aspects of the population and hold the potential for the further development of indices to disentangle phenology, attendance of breeding birds, and reproductive success. We found that image counts are comparable with standard methods (e.g., radar) in producing annual abundance indices. We recommend that managers consider a sampling scheme that incorporates both acoustics and imaging, but for sites inaccessible to humans, radar remains the sole option. Implementation of acoustic and camera based monitoring programs will provide much needed information for a vulnerable group of seabirds.

Funder

U.S. Geological Survey under the Science Support Program

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Inventory and Monitoring Program

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Region 1 Migratory Birds and Habitat Program

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference63 articles.

1. Black-swan events in animal populations;Anderson;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2017

2. Census and monitoring of puffins Fratercula arctica on rost, N Norway, 1979–1988;Anker-Nilssen;Ornis Scandinavica,1993

3. Seabird distribution patterns observed with fishing vessel’s radar reveal previously undescribed sub-meso-scale clusters;Assali;Scientific Reports,2017

4. Migration counts of raptors at Hawk Mountain, Pennsylvania, as indicators of population trends, 1934–1986;Bednarz;The Auk,1990

5. Use of radar for monitoring colonial burrow-nesting seabirds;Bertram;Journal of Field Ornithology,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3