Effects of delivery via pressure-adjustable pneumatic gas-powered dart gun of three antimicrobial drugs (ceftiofur crystalline free acid, tildopirosin, and tulathromycin) on drug disposition and meat quality in cattle

Author:

Hairgrove Thomas B.1,Fajt Virginia2ORCID,Gill Ronald1,Miller Rhonda1,Miller Michael13ORCID,Mays Travis4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States

2. Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States

3. Current affiliation: W.H. Miner Institute, Chazy, NY, US

4. Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College Station, TX, United States

Abstract

Background Although Beef Quality Assurance guidelines do not recommend use of darting methods to deliver drugs, cattle in the US may be raised on farms and ranches without restraint facilities, and reports from the field suggest that dart guns are being used to deliver antimicrobial drugs. Few studies report whether this route of administration results in altered drug disposition or carcass quality. Methods Forty steers were blocked by sire and then randomly assigned to treatment with saline, ceftiofur crystalline free acid, tildipirosin, or tulathromycin delivered via dart gun. To assess drug disposition, eight ceftiofur, six tulathromycin, and six tildipirosin-treated calves were selected to measure plasma concentrations of drugs up to 10 days after drug administration. Steers were then fed a balanced ration for approximately 6.5 months and slaughtered. To evaluate carcass quality, tenderness of steaks from darted-side and non-darted sides was evaluated via Warner–Bratzler shear force testing. Due to the prohibition of extralabel routes of administration for ceftiofur in the U.S., animals treated with this drug did not enter the food supply. Results Ceftiofur disposition differed from published reports with lower mean Cmax but similar mean apparent elimination half-life. Tildipirosin disposition differed from published reports with lower Cmax and shorter apparent elimination half-life. Tulathromycin was similar to previous published reports but Cmax and apparent elimination half-life was highly variable. All steaks (from darted and non-darted sides) from cattle treated with ceftiofur and saline were more tender than from cattle treated with tulathromycin or tildipirosin (P = 0.003). There was a trend toward more tenderness in steaks from the non-darted compared to the darted side. Steaks from the darted side for one treatment, tildipirosin, were less tender than the non-darted side. Conclusions Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftiofur crystalline free acid, tildipirosin, and tulathromycin to cattle using pressure-adjustable pneumatic gas-powered dart gun were estimated in this study. Delivery of tildipirosin and tulathromycin to cattle with dart gun may also result in detectable decreases in tenderness of harvested steaks.

Funder

Texas Beef Council

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference18 articles.

1. Pneumatic dart delivery of tulathromycin in calves results in lower antimicrobial concentrations and increased biomarkers of stress and injection site inflammation compared with subcutaneous injection;Coetzee;Journal of Animal Science,2018

2. Rapid and prolonged distribution of tulathromycin into lung homogenate and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid of holstein calves following a single subcutaneous administration of 2.5 mg/kg body weight;Cox;International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine,2010

3. Evaluation of an air-powered vaccine delivery system;Edwards;The Bovine Practitioner,1993

4. The stocker cattle supply chain;Falconer;Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice,2006

5. Comparison of active drug concentrations in the pulmonary epithelial lining fluid and interstitial fluid of calves injected with enrofloxacin, florfenicol, ceftiofur, or tulathromycin;Foster;PLOS ONE,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3