Influence of hunting strategy on foraging efficiency in Galapagos sea lions

Author:

Blakeway Jessica-Anne1,Arnould John P.Y.1,Hoskins Andrew J.2,Martin-Cabrera Patricia1,Sutton Grace J.1,Huckstadt Luis A.3,Costa Daniel P.4,Páez-Rosas Diego56,Villegas-Amtmann Stella3

Affiliation:

1. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

2. CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

3. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America

4. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, United States of America

5. Universidad San Francisco de Quito and Galapagos Science Center, Islas Galápagos, Ecuador

6. Dirección Parque Nacional Galápagos, Oficina Técnica Operativa San Cristóbal, Islas Galápagos, Ecuador

Abstract

The endangered Galapagos sea lion (GSL, Zalophus wollebaeki) exhibits a range of foraging strategies utilising various dive types including benthic, epipelagic and mesopelagic dives. In the present study, potential prey captures (PPC), prey energy consumption and energy expenditure in lactating adult female GSLs (n = 9) were examined to determine their foraging efficiency relative to the foraging strategy used. Individuals displayed four dive types: (a) epipelagic (<100 m; EP); or (b) mesopelagic (>100 m; MP) with a characteristic V-shape or U-shape diving profile; and (c) shallow benthic (<100 m; SB) or (d) deep benthic (>100 m; DB) with square or flat-bottom dive profiles. These dive types varied in the number of PPC, assumed prey types, and the energy expended. Prey items and their energetic value were assumed from previous GSL diet studies in combination with common habitat and depth ranges of the prey. In comparison to pelagic dives occurring at similar depths, when diving benthically, GSLs had both higher prey energy consumption and foraging energy expenditure whereas PPC rate was lower. Foraging efficiency varied across dive types, with benthic dives being more profitable than pelagic dives. Three foraging trip strategies were identified and varied relative to prey energy consumed, energy expended, and dive behaviour. Foraging efficiency did not significantly vary among the foraging trip strategies suggesting that, while individuals may diverge into different foraging habitats, they are optimal within them. These findings indicate that these three strategies will have different sensitivities to habitat-specific fluctuations due to environmental change.

Funder

Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Office of Naval Research

E&P Sound and Marine Life Joint Industry Project of the IAGOP

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference73 articles.

1. Diving physiology of seabirds and marine mammals: relevance, challenges and some solutions for field studies;Andrews;Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology—Part A,2016

2. Sea lions in drag, fur seals incognito: insights from the otariid deviants;Arnould,2006

3. Package lme4;Bates;Journal of Statistical Software,2015

4. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization;Bolnick;The American Naturalist,2003

5. Physiology of diving of birds and mammals;Butler;Physiological Reviews,1997

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3