Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain
2. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
3. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
4. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Abstract
Background
Effective rehabilitation of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders requires multimodal assessment to guide clinicians’ decision-making. Furthermore, a comprehensive assessment must include reliable tests. Nevertheless, the interrelationship among various upper limb tests remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of easily applicable upper extremity assessments, including absolute values and asymmetries of muscle mechanical properties, pressure pain threshold, active range of motion, maximal isometric strength, and manual dexterity. A secondary aim was to explore correlations between different assessment procedures to determine their interrelationship.
Methods
Thirty healthy subjects participated in two experimental sessions with 1 week between sessions. Measurements involved using a digital myotonometer, algometer, inclinometer, dynamometer, and the Nine-Hole Peg test. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of the mean, and minimum detectable change were calculated as reliability indicators. Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the interrelationship between tests.
Results
For the absolute values of the dominant and nondominant sides, reliability was ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ for muscle mechanical properties, pressure pain thresholds, active range of motion, maximal isometric strength, and manual dexterity. Similarly, the reliability for asymmetries ranged from ‘moderate’ to ‘excellent’ across the same parameters. Faster performance in the second session was consistently found for the Nine-Hole Peg test. No systematic inter-session errors were identified for the values of the asymmetries. No significant correlations were found between tests, indicating test independence.
Conclusion
These findings indicate that the sensorimotor battery of tests is reliable, while monitoring asymmetry changes may offer a more conservative approach to effectively tracking recovery of upper extremity injuries.
Funder
Departamento de Ciencia, Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, from the Gobierno de Aragón
Gobierno de Aragón
Reference57 articles.
1. Quadriceps muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness in older males: reliability and symmetry using the MyotonPRO;Aird;Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics,2012
2. The P value and statistical significance: misunderstandings, explanations, challenges, and alternatives;Andrade;Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine,2019
3. The functional dexterity test in adult populations: an exploration of a simplified test protocol and parameters guided by statistical outcomes;Bachman;Journal of Hand Therapy,2023
4. A technical report on reliability measurement in asymmetry studies;Bailey;Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,2021
5. Multi-sensory training and wrist fractures: a randomized, controlled trial;Baldursdottir;Aging Clinical and Experimental Research,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献