A novel multi-layer perceptron model for assessing the diagnostic value of non-invasive imaging instruments for rosacea

Author:

Huang Yingxue123,He Jieyu4,Zhang Shuping123,Tang Yan123,Wang Ben123,Jian Dan123,Xie Hongfu123,Li Ji123,Chen Feng5,Zhao Zhixiang123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

2. Hunan Key Laboratory of Aging Biology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

3. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

4. School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kuming, Yunnan, China

5. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Abstract

Background Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), VISIA, and dermoscopy have emerged as promising tools for objective diagnosis and assessment of rosacea. However, little is known about the diagnostic value of these imaging systems for rosacea. Objectives To assess the diagnostic value of RCM, VISIA, and dermoscopy for rosacea by establishing a novel multilayer perceptron (MLP) model. Methods A total of 520 patients with rosacea and other facial diseases were included in this study. A total of 474 samples of dermoscopy data, 374 samples of RCM data, 434 samples of VISIA data, and 291 samples containing three data sources were collected. An MLP model was built with the total data to explore the association between the imageological features of each instrument and the probability of rosacea. Results Our MLP model revealed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of RCM, VISIA and dermoscopy for diagnosing rosacea were 0.5233, 0.5646 and 0.7971, respectively. The integration of these three tools with clinical data could further improve the accuracy of the predictive diagnosis to 0.8385. For the imageological features of each tool, abnormalities (hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis) in the stratum corneum were effective variables for excluding rosacea (odds ratio [OR], 0.4333) under RCM. The indicators of rosacea under VISIA included overall severity of erythema, erythema involving the cheek or superciliary arch, visible red blood vessels, and papules (OR = 2.2745, 3.1592, 1.8365, 2.8647, and 1.4260, respectively). The candidate variables of dermoscopy included yellow background, white background, uniform distribution of vessels, branched vessels, and reticular blood vessels (OR = 0.4259, 0.4949, 2.2858, 3.7444, and 2.4576, respectively). Conclusions RCM, dermoscopy, and VISIA each can present several imageological features and were of certain value for assisting rosacea diagnosis. The combined analysis of these three tools using our MLP model may be useful for improving the accuracy of diagnosing rosacea.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference35 articles.

1. The new therapeutic choice of tranexamic acid solution in treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea;Bageorgou;Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology,2019

2. Ros-NET: A deep convolutional neural network for automatic identification of rosacea lesions;Binol;Skin Research and Technology: Official Journal of International Society For Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society For Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society For Skin Imaging (ISSI),2020

3. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method;Bland;BMJ,1995

4. Quantification of Demodex folliculorum by PCR in rosacea and its relationship to skin innate immune activation;Casas;Experimental Dermatology,2012

5. Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society;Errichetti;British Journal of Dermatology,2020

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3