Droplet distribution in cotton canopy using single-rotor and four-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are widely used as the sprayers for low-volume pesticide application in recent years. Droplet distribution characteristics of UAV spraying in the cotton canopy have notable effect on the biological control efficacy of the targets and the defoliation efficiency of the harvest aids. In this work, the influences on droplet distribution in the cotton canopy with respect to the flight height, forward mode, and spraying volume were evaluated by conducting the field trials during two cotton growth stages in 2020, respectively. The first field trial was performed in the cotton flowering stage and the second one was conducted in the early boll development stage. Two typical UAVs equipped with a single-rotor and four-rotor, respectively, were adopted as the spraying platforms in this work. Droplet deposition obtained by water sensitive papers (WSPs) clipped on the cotton leaves was considered as the observing metric. All cotton leaves in the canopy were divided into three groups (i.e., upper, middle, and bottom layers) in both trials. Furthermore, the cotton canopy was divided as eight directions to assess the droplet distribution in the canopy from different directions. The results showed that the droplet deposition varied remarkable between the treatments and in the same canopy within a treatment. The upper layer obtained higher droplet deposition than those of the middle and bottom layers and plants P4 to P8 accessed more droplets than those of the remaining sampling plants in most treatments of both trials for the two UAVs. The upper layer droplet deposition of the four-rotor UAV treatments outperformed that of the single-rotor treatments under the same operating parameters. The forward modes rarely affected the droplet distribution of the four-rotor UAV treatments but significantly influenced that of the single-rotor UAV treatments. For the single-rotor UAV spraying with “head forward”, the droplet distribution of the treatment with a flight height of 2 m was more even than that of the 1 and 3 m in the first trial. Under the same flight height, droplet deposition of the treatments with a spraying volume of 22.5 L ha−1 was remarkably higher than that of the 12 L ha−1 for both forward modes in the second trial. “Tail forward” of the single-rotor UAV treatment had better penetration at a flight height of 2 m in both trials. Therefore, for the single-rotor UAV, under a flight height of 2 m and a spraying volume of 22.5 L ha−1, “tail forward” was recommended for applying pesticides to control targets at the lower canopy and “head forward” was a better choice for harvest aid application. Four-rotor UAV was a suitable adoption for the harvest aid application and controlling the targets of the upper canopy. The results also indicate that the systemic pesticides are recommended for UAV spraying due to its uneven droplet distribution uniformity in the whole cotton canopy.