Affiliation:
1. School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
2. University College, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
Abstract
Species in the genus Ganoderma include several ecologically important and pathogenic fungal species whose medicinal and economic value is substantial. Due to the highly similar morphological features within the Ganoderma, identification of species has relied heavily on DNA sequencing using BLAST searches, which are only reliable if the GenBank submissions are accurately labeled. In this study, we examined 113 specimens collected from 1969 to 2016 from various regions in Korea using morphological features and multigene analysis (internal transcribed spacer, translation elongation factor 1-α, and the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II). These specimens were identified as four Ganoderma species: G. sichuanense, G. cf. adspersum, G. cf. applanatum, and G. cf. gibbosum. With the exception of G. sichuanense, these species were difficult to distinguish based solely on morphological features. However, phylogenetic analysis at three different loci yielded concordant phylogenetic information, and supported the four species distinctions with high bootstrap support. A survey of over 600 Ganoderma sequences available on GenBank revealed that 65% of sequences were either misidentified or ambiguously labeled. Here, we suggest corrected annotations for GenBank sequences based on our phylogenetic validation and provide updated global distribution patterns for these Ganoderma species.
Funder
National Institute of Biological Resources under the Ministry of Environment
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience
Reference48 articles.
1. Phylogenetic and phylogenomic overview of the Polyporales;Binder;Mycologia,2013
2. From 2000 years of Ganoderma lucidum to recent developments in nutraceuticals;Bishop;Phytochemistry,2015
3. Fungi javanici, editi conjunctis studis et opera;Blume;Nova Nova Acta Caesar Leop Carol Halle,1826
4. On the unreliability of published DNA sequences;Bridge;New Phytologist,2003
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献