Prediction of Ross River virus incidence in Queensland, Australia: building and comparing models

Author:

Qian Wei1,Harley David1,Glass Kathryn2,Viennet Elvina34,Hurst Cameron56

Affiliation:

1. The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia

2. Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

3. Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia

4. Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia

5. Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

6. Department of Statistics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Transmission of Ross River virus (RRV) is influenced by climatic, environmental, and socio-economic factors. Accurate and robust predictions based on these factors are necessary for disease prevention and control. However, the complicated transmission cycle and the characteristics of RRV notification data present challenges. Studies to compare model performance are lacking. In this study, we used RRV notification data and exposure data from 2001 to 2020 in Queensland, Australia, and compared ten models (including generalised linear models, zero-inflated models, and generalised additive models) to predict RRV incidence in different regions of Queensland. We aimed to compare model performance and to evaluate the effect of statistical over-dispersion and zero-inflation of RRV surveillance data, and non-linearity of predictors on model fit. A variable selection strategy for screening important predictors was developed and was found to be efficient and able to generate consistent and reasonable numbers of predictors across regions and in all training sets. Negative binomial models generally exhibited better model fit than Poisson models, suggesting that over-dispersion in the data is the primary factor driving model fit compared to non-linearity of predictors and excess zeros. All models predicted the peak periods well but were unable to fit and predict the magnitude of peaks, especially when there were high numbers of cases. Adding new variables including historical RRV cases and mosquito abundance may improve model performance. The standard negative binomial generalised linear model is stable, simple, and effective in prediction, and is thus considered the best choice among all models.

Funder

University of Queensland Research Training Scholarship and Frank Clair Scholarship

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference56 articles.

1. A new look at the statistical model identification;Akaike;IEEE transactions on automatic control,1974

2. User’s guide to correlation coefficients;Akoglu;Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine,2018

3. Statistical area level 3 (SA3);Australian Bureau of Statistics,2016

4. Ross River virus infection case definition;Australian Department of Health,2016

5. Geoscience Australia;Australian Government,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3