Affiliation:
1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
2. Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background
During counter movement jumps, adding weight in the eccentric phase and then suddenly releasing this weight during the concentric phase, known as accentuated eccentric loading (AEL), has been suggested to immediately improve jumping performance. The level of evidence for the positive effects of AEL remains weak, with conflicting evidence over the effectiveness in enhancing performance. Therefore, we proposed to theoretically explore the influence of implementing AEL during constrained vertical jumping using computer modelling and simulation and examined whether the proposed mechanism of enhanced power, increased elastic energy storage and return, could enhance work and power.
Methods
We used a simplified model, consisting of a ball-shaped body (head, arm, and trunk), two lower limb segments (thigh and shank), and four muscles, to simulate the mechanisms of AEL. We adjusted the key activation parameters of the muscles to influence the performance outcome of the model. Numerical optimization was applied to search the optimal solution for the model. We implemented AEL and non-AEL conditions in the model to compare the simulated data between conditions.
Results
Our model predicted that the optimal jumping performance was achieved when the model utilized the whole joint range. However, there was no difference in jumping performance in AEL and non-AEL conditions because the model began its push-off at the similar state (posture, fiber length, fiber velocity, fiber force, tendon length, and the same activation level). Therefore, the optimal solution predicted by the model was primarily driven by intrinsic muscle dynamics (force-length-velocity relationship), and this coupled with the similar model state at the start of the push-off, resulting in similar push-off performance across all conditions. There was also no evidence of additional tendon-loading effect in AEL conditions compared to non-AEL condition.
Discussion
Our simplified simulations did not show improved jump performance with AEL, contrasting with experimental studies. The reduced model demonstrates that increased energy storage from the additional mass alone is not sufficient to induce increased performance and that other factors like differences in activation strategies or movement paths are more likely to contribute to enhanced performance.
Funder
UQ Graduate School Scholarship
Australian Research Council Future Fellowship
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience
Reference41 articles.
1. Does performing drop jumps with additional eccentric loading improve jump performance?;Aboodarda;Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,2014
2. Eccentric and concentric jumping performance during augmented jumps with elastic resistance: a meta-analysis;Aboodarda;International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy,2015
3. Enhanced performance with elastic resistance during the eccentric phase of a countermovement jump;Aboodarda;International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance,2013
4. A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions;Anderson;Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering,1999
5. Effect of unloading and loading on power in simulated countermovement and squat jumps;Bobbert;Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,2014