Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Abstract
As scientific publication rates increase, knowledge acquisition and the research development process have become more complex and time-consuming. Literature-Based Discovery (LBD), supporting automated knowledge discovery, helps facilitate this process by eliciting novel knowledge by analysing existing scientific literature. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the LBD workflow by answering nine research questions related to the major components of the LBD workflow (i.e., input, process, output, and evaluation). With regards to theinputcomponent, we discuss the data types and data sources used in the literature. Theprocesscomponent presents filtering techniques, ranking/thresholding techniques, domains, generalisability levels, and resources. Subsequently, theoutputcomponent focuses on the visualisation techniques used in LBD discipline. As for theevaluationcomponent, we outline the evaluation techniques, their generalisability, and the quantitative measures used to validate results. To conclude, we summarise the findings of the review for each component by highlighting the possible future research directions.
Reference138 articles.
1. Literature-based discovery: critical analysis and future directions;Ahmed;International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security,2016
2. An information-theoretic perspective of tf—idf measures;Aizawa;Information Processing & Management,2003
3. Enriching plausible new hypothesis generation in PubMed;Baek;PLOS ONE,2017
4. Automated suggestion of tests for identifying likelihood of adverse drug events;Banerjee,2014
5. Mining generalized association rules on biomedical literature;Berardi,2005
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献