Affiliation:
1. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
2. Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany
3. University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Abstract
In recent years, a large body of literature has accumulated around the topic of research paper recommender systems. However, since most studies have focused on the variable of accuracy, they have overlooked the serendipity of recommendations, which is an important determinant of user satisfaction. Serendipity is concerned with the relevance and unexpectedness of recommendations, and so serendipitous items are considered those which positively surprise users. The purpose of this article was to examine two key research questions: firstly, whether a user’s Tweets can assist in generating more serendipitous recommendations; and secondly, whether the diversification of a list of recommended items further improves serendipity. To investigate these issues, an online experiment was conducted in the domain of computer science with 22 subjects. As an evaluation metric, we use the serendipity score (SRDP), in which the unexpectedness of recommendations is inferred by using a primitive recommendation strategy. The results indicate that a user’s Tweets do not improve serendipity, but they can reflect recent research interests and are typically heterogeneous. Contrastingly, diversification was found to lead to a greater number of serendipitous research paper recommendations.
Funder
EU H2020 project MOVING
JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists
Reference45 articles.
1. Semantic enrichment of twitter posts for user profile construction on the social web;Abel,2011
2. Extraction of professional interests from social web profiles;Abel,2011
3. Science concierge: a fast content-based recommendation system for scientific publications;Achakulvisut;PLOS ONE,2016
4. Diversifying search results;Agrawal,2009
5. Scientific paper recommendation: a survey;Bai;IEEE Access,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献