Affiliation:
1. CQSE GmbH, München, Germany
2. Institute of Software Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Abstract
BackgroundTest resources are usually limited and therefore it is often not possible to completely test an application before a release. To cope with the problem of scarce resources, development teams can apply defect prediction to identify fault-prone code regions. However, defect prediction tends to low precision in cross-project prediction scenarios.AimsWe take an inverse view on defect prediction and aim to identify methods that can be deferred when testing because they contain hardly any faults due to their code being “trivial”. We expect that characteristics of such methods might be project-independent, so that our approach could improve cross-project predictions.MethodWe compute code metrics and apply association rule mining to create rules for identifying methods with low fault risk (LFR). We conduct an empirical study to assess our approach with six Java open-source projects containing precise fault data at the method level.ResultsOur results show that inverse defect prediction can identify approx. 32–44% of the methods of a project to have a LFR; on average, they are about six times less likely to contain a fault than other methods. In cross-project predictions with larger, more diversified training sets, identified methods are even 11 times less likely to contain a fault.ConclusionsInverse defect prediction supports the efficient allocation of test resources by identifying methods that can be treated with less priority in testing activities and is well applicable in cross-project prediction scenarios.
Funder
Institute of Software Technology of the University of Stuttgart
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Reference75 articles.
1. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases;Agrawal;ACM SIGMOD Record,1993
2. Fast algorithms for mining association rules;Agrawal,1994
3. Are popular classes more defect prone?;Bacchelli,2010
4. The missing links: bugs and bug-fix commits;Bachmann,2010
5. Constraint-based rule mining in large, dense databases;Bayardo,1999
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Assessing Software Fault Risk with Machine Learning;Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications;2022
2. Optimising Analytical Software Quality Assurance;Software Quality: Quality Intelligence in Software and Systems Engineering;2019-12-09