Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories

Author:

Garijo Daniel1,Ménager Hervé2ORCID,Hwang Lorraine3ORCID,Trisovic Ana4,Hucka Michael5,Morrell Thomas5ORCID,Allen Alice6ORCID, ,

Affiliation:

1. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

2. Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, Paris, France

3. University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States

4. Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

5. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States

6. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States

Abstract

Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research reproducibility and replicability, but developing them takes effort and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of these resources. To address this need, the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group convened a Task Force to distill the experiences of the managers of existing resources in setting expectations for all stakeholders. In this article, we describe the resultant best practices which include defining the scope, policies, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories, along with the background, examples, and collaborative work that went into their development. We believe that establishing specific policies such as those presented here will help other scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines.

Funder

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Heidelberg Institute of Theoretical Studies

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference67 articles.

1. Astrophysics source code library;Allen;Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXII,2013

2. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the contributor role taxonomy (credit) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship;Allen;Learned Publishing,2019

3. Looking before leaping: creating a software registry;Allen;Journal of Open Research Software,2015

4. Attributing and referencing (research) software: best practices and outlook from inria;Alliez;Computing in Science and Engineering,2019

5. ARC open access policy;Australian Research Council,2018

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3