Affiliation:
1. Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute—Software Engineering, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
2. Process Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany
3. Herman Hollerith Center, Böblingen & Reutlingen University, Böblingen, Germany
4. Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finnland
Abstract
Software process improvement (SPI) has been around for decades: frameworks are proposed, success factors are studied, and experiences have been reported. However, the sheer mass of concepts, approaches, and standards published over the years overwhelms practitioners as well as researchers. What is out there? Are there new trends and emerging approaches? What are open issues? Still, we struggle to answer these questions about the current state of SPI and related research. In this article, we present results from an updated systematic mapping study to shed light on the field of SPI, to develop a big picture of the state of the art, and to draw conclusions for future research directions. An analysis of 769 publications draws a big picture of SPI-related research of the past quarter-century. Our study shows a high number of solution proposals, experience reports, and secondary studies, but only few theories and models on SPI in general. In particular, standard SPI models like CMMI and ISO/IEC 15,504 are analyzed, enhanced, and evaluated for applicability in practice, but these standards are also critically discussed, e.g., from the perspective of SPI in small-to-medium-sized companies, which leads to new specialized frameworks. New and specialized frameworks account for the majority of the contributions found (approx. 38%). Furthermore, we find a growing interest in success factors (approx. 16%) to aid companies in conducting SPI and in adapting agile principles and practices for SPI (approx. 10%). Beyond these specific topics, the study results also show an increasing interest into secondary studies with the purpose of aggregating and structuring SPI-related knowledge. Finally, the present study helps directing future research by identifying under-researched topics awaiting further investigation.
Funder
German Ministry of Education and Research
Reference47 articles.
1. Organizational factors shaping software process improvement in small-medium sized software teams: A multi-case analysis;Allison,2010
2. De-motivators for software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners’ views;Baddoo;Journal of Systems and Software,2003
3. Critical success factors taxonomy for software process deployment;Bayona-Oré;Software Quality Journal,2014
4. What small businesses and small organizations say about the cmm;Brodman,1994
5. Investigating software process in practice: a grounded theory perspective;Coleman;Journal of Systems and Software,2008
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献