Prescriptive process monitoring: Quo vadis?

Author:

Kubrak Kateryna1,Milani Fredrik1,Nolte Alexander12,Dumas Marlon1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

2. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America

Abstract

Prescriptive process monitoring methods seek to optimize a business process by recommending interventions at runtime to prevent negative outcomes or address poorly performing cases. In recent years, various prescriptive process monitoring methods have been proposed. This article studies existing methods in this field via a systematic literature review (SLR). In order to structure the field, this article proposes a framework for characterizing prescriptive process monitoring methods according to their performance objective, performance metrics, intervention types, modeling techniques, data inputs, and intervention policies. The SLR provides insights into challenges and areas for future research that could enhance the usefulness and applicability of prescriptive process monitoring methods. This article highlights the need to validate existing and new methods in real-world settings, extend the types of interventions beyond those related to the temporal and cost perspectives, and design policies that take into account causality and second-order effects.

Funder

The Estonian Research Council

The European Research Council

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference54 articles.

1. A resource recommendation approach based on co-working history;Abdulhameed;International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications,2018

2. A user evaluation of process discovery algorithms in a software engineering company;Agostinelli,2019

3. Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies;Ampatzoglou;Information and Software Technology,2019

4. A multi-criteria approach for team recommendation;Arias,2016

5. Human resource allocation in business process management and process mining: a systematic mapping study;Arias;Management Decision,2018

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prescriptive analytics systems revised: a systematic literature review from an information systems perspective;Information Systems and e-Business Management;2024-08-30

2. Watt’s Next? Leveraging Process Flexibility for Power Cost Optimization;Business & Information Systems Engineering;2024-08-14

3. Enhancing E-learning effectiveness: a process mining approach for short-term tutorials;Journal of Intelligent Information Systems;2024-08-08

4. Improving Process Mining Maturity – From Intentions to Actions;Business & Information Systems Engineering;2024-07-30

5. Data-Driven Identification and Analysis of Waiting Times in Business Processes;Business & Information Systems Engineering;2024-05-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3