Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology

Author:

Clark Amanda D.12,Myers Tanner C.1,Steury Todd D.3,Krzton Ali4,Yanes Julio1,Barber Angela1,Barry Jacqueline1,Barua Subarna5,Eaton Katherine1,Gosavi Devadatta1,Nance Rebecca5,Pervaiz Zahida1,Ugochukwu Chidozie6,Hartman Patricia4,Stevison Laurie S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America

2. Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America

3. College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America

4. Auburn University Libraries, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America

5. Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America

6. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America

Abstract

Authors are often faced with the decision of whether to maximize traditional impact metrics or minimize costs when choosing where to publish the results of their research. Many subscription-based journals now offer the option of paying an article processing charge (APC) to make their work open. Though such “hybrid” journals make research more accessible to readers, their APCs often come with high price tags and can exclude authors who lack the capacity to pay to make their research accessible. Here, we tested if paying to publish open access in a subscription-based journal benefited authors by conferring more citations relative to closed access articles. We identified 146,415 articles published in 152 hybrid journals in the field of biology from 2013–2018 to compare the number of citations between various types of open access and closed access articles. In a simple generalized linear model analysis of our full dataset, we found that publishing open access in hybrid journals that offer the option confers an average citation advantage to authors of 17.8 citations compared to closed access articles in similar journals. After taking into account the number of authors, Journal Citation Reports 2020 Quartile, year of publication, and Web of Science category, we still found that open access generated significantly more citations than closed access (p < 0.0001). However, results were complex, with exact differences in citation rates among access types impacted by these other variables. This citation advantage based on access type was even similar when comparing open and closed access articles published in the same issue of a journal (p < 0.0001). However, by examining articles where the authors paid an article processing charge, we found that cost itself was not predictive of citation rates (p = 0.14). Based on our findings of access type and other model parameters, we suggest that, in the case of the 152 journals we analyzed, paying for open access does confer a citation advantage. For authors with limited budgets, we recommend pursuing open access alternatives that do not require paying a fee as they still yielded more citations than closed access. For authors who are considering where to submit their next article, we offer additional suggestions on how to balance exposure via citations with publishing costs.

Publisher

PeerJ

Reference46 articles.

1. Inexpensive research in the golden open-access era;Alizon;Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2018

2. Why I think ending article-processing charges will save open access;Alperin;Nature,2022

3. The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals;AlRyalat;Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2019

4. Exploring the hidden impacts of open access financing mechanisms: AAAS survey on scholarly publication experiences & perspectives;American Association for the Advancement of Science,2022

5. Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers;Archambault;Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, Etc.,2016

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3