Increasing the scope and scale of agroecology in the Northern Great Plains
-
Published:2024-04-16
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-6
-
ISSN:2152-0801
-
Container-title:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev.
Author:
Maxwell BruceORCID, Duff Hannah
Abstract
First paragraph: Large Scale Agroecology Agroecology is a science, practice, and movement that is gaining momentum worldwide. It aims to provide local, stable, and diverse diets through diversified, resilient, and sustainable agricultural practices (Ewert et al. 2023). However, agroecology seeks to address food systems issues by replacing large-scale commodity-based agriculture with something very different. Agroecology is typically discussed within the scope and scale of smallholder farming while failing to address the issues embedded in large-scale commodity-based agriculture. While we do not take issue with an ideal system where food is produced on small farms, it does not need to exclude agroecology applied to current scales of agriculture in regions like the Northern Great Plains (NGP), where agriculture consists of spatially extensive crop and livestock farms. NGP farms have internal sustainability problems and harmful social, racial, and environmental externalities that can be addressed with agroecological principles. Despite the problems, the large scale of NGP agriculture is not likely to change much in coming decades, and so there is an imperative to apply agroecological principles at larger scales to address immediate issues. We emphasize that applying agroecological principles to large-scale farming could increase crop and forage diversity, conserve biodiversity, strengthen cross-boundary and multi-objective ecosystem management, address regional food security, and encourage co-innovation with crop and livestock producers in the NGP (Tittonell, 2020). If agroecologists don’t address the immediate issues of NGP such as climate change adaptation and mitigation, livestock-based protein production, unequal access to nutritious food, agriautomation, and pandemic food system disruption, then we may only expect industrialized agriculture to provide short-sited profit-motivated solutions repeating a pattern of the past. . . .
Publisher
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
Reference15 articles.
1. Conant, R. T., Kluck, D., Anderson, M. T., Badger, A., Boustead, B. M., Derner, J. D., Farris, L., Hayes, M., Livneh, B., McNeeley, S., & Peck, D. (2018). Northern Great Plains. In D. Reidmiller, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, & B. C. Stewart (Eds.), Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth national climate assessment (pp. 941-986). U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH22 2. Duff, H., Hegedus, P., Loewen, S., Bass, T., & Maxwell, B. D. (2022). Precision agroecology. Sustainability, 14(1), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010106 3. Duff, H., Debinski, D., & Maxwell, B. D. (2024). Ecological refugia enhance biodiversity and crop production in dryland grain production systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 359, Article 108751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108751 4. Ewert, F., Baatz, R., & Finger, R. (2023). Agroecology for a sustainable agriculture and food system: From local solutions to large-scale adoption. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 15, 351-381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102422-090105 5. Hooper, D. U., Chapin III, F.S., Ewel, J.J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., & Schmid, B. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0922
|
|