Underserved farmers’ barriers to adoption of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service climate-smart agricultural practices in South Carolina
-
Published:2024-08-29
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-13
-
ISSN:2152-0801
-
Container-title:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev.
Author:
Guynn SusanORCID, Player W., Burns Matthew
Abstract
Agribusiness has an annual economic impact of US $51.8 billion in South Carolina (South Carolina Department of Agriculture, n.d.). It is supported by underserved farmers and ranchers who represent 9.3% of all South Carolina farms and 8% of all farmland acres (USDA, 2024). Further, almost 35% of South Carolina farmers or producers are female (USDA, 2024). This small group of farmers and ranchers represents an important economic sector in agriculture and could benefit from participation in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) climate-smart agriculture programs to enhance or increase their farming operations. In addition, implementing climate-smart agricultural practices can help to offset the negative impacts of the increased frequency and intensity of disturbances (e.g., drought and flooding). However, previous research has shown that underserved farmers and ranchers do not participate in USDA NRCS programs at the same rate as other farmers (Gilbert et al., 2002; Minkoff-Zern & Sloat, 2017; Russell et al., 2021). This research sought to (1) identify the barriers to participation in USDA NRCS programs and (2) develop recommendations for overcoming the barriers. Eight focus groups were conducted between June 2022 and March 2023 either virtually (n = 5) or in-person (n = 3) with underserved farmers and ranchers (n = 22) around the state to identify barriers to participation in USDA NRCS climate-smart agricultural programs. Program participants were self-selected using a nonprobability sampling technique (snowball sampling) and were recruited by contacts provided to the researchers by Clemson Extension agents and nongovernmental organizations that represent historically socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers. Three primary barriers were identified: (1) lack of program clarity and visibility, (2) lack of accountability, and (3) lack of NRCS support. Recommendations are provided to address and overcome each barrier.
Publisher
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
Reference41 articles.
1. Asare-Baah, L., Zabawa, R., & Findlay, H. J. (2018). Participation in selected USDA programs by socially disadvantaged farmers in Black Belt counties in Georgia. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 33(1), Article 2. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol33/iss1/2 2. Babbie, E. R. (2017). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Cengage Learning. 3. Balvanz, P., Barlow, M. L., Lewis, L. M., Samuel, K., Ownes, W., Parker, D. L., De Marco, M., Crowder, R., Williams, Y., Barker, D., Lightfoot, A., & Ammerman, A. (2011). "The next generation, that's why we continue to do what we do": African American farmers speak about experiences with land ownership and loss in North Carolina. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(3), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2011.013.011 4. Boland, M. A., Crespi, J. M., & Oswald, D. (2009). An analysis of the 2002 farm bill's value-added producer grants program. Journal of Agribusiness, 27(1-2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.90660 5. Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
|
|