A pilot study assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on Tennessee farmer social needs and pandemic-related anxiety

Author:

McElrone MarissaORCID,Russomanno JenniferORCID,Wroth Kathryn

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic affected the U.S. food systems in unprecedented ways, from restaurant closures to supply chain disruptions. Farmers were left to discover innovative ways to market and sell their perishable products in the absence of tradi­tional outlets like restaurants and farmers markets. As farmers are important anchors to local food systems, the impact of the pandemic on the their health needs to be explored. This pilot study explored how COVID-19 influenced Tennessee-based farmers’ social needs, as well as their anxiety related to COVID-19. We conducted a cross-sectional pilot survey among Tennessee farmers to screen for social needs (e.g., financial, childcare, utilities, food, and housing security) and pandemic-specific anxiety, and to assess the utilization of farmer-specific COVID-19 relief funding oppor­tunities. Forty farmers from all three regions in Tennessee participated. There was an increase in positive screens for all measured social needs items from pre- to during COVID-19. Respondents reported increased financial (24.9%), childcare (21.7%), food (20.7%), utility (10.4%), and housing (7.1%) insecurity during the pandemic. Most respondents reported some level of anxiety related to COVID-19 (mean score 20.0 ± 5.65). More than half of respondents indicated they did not apply for any farmer-specific COVID-19 relief funding (54.3%). Tennessee farmers are experiencing gaps in their social needs during COVID-19; however, many did not utilize the financial assistance pro­grams available to them. Future studies, with larger, more representative samples, should further explore the relationship between farm household social needs and the underutilization of both farmer-specific external relief funding and other social safety net programs during and beyond the pandemic.

Publisher

Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Aldana, S. G., & Liljenquist, W. (1998). Validity and reliability of a financial strain survey. Financial Counseling and Planning, 9(2), 11-19. https://www.afcpe.org/news-and-publications/journal-of-financial-counseling-and-planning/volume-9-2/validity-and-reliability-of-a-financial-strain-survey/

2. Alston, M. (2007). "It's really not easy to get help": Services to drought-affected families. Australian Social Work, 60(4), 421-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070701671149

3. American Academy of Family Physicians. (2018). Social Needs Screening Tool. https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/everyone_project/hops19-physician-form-sdoh.pdf

4. Becot, F. A., & Inwood, S. M. (2020). The case for integrating household social needs and social policy into the international family farm research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 77, 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.05.005

5. Botterill, L. C. (2007). Responding to farm poverty in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140601158534

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3