Marketing opportunities and challenges for locally raised meats: An online consumer survey in South Carolina
-
Published:2023-03-13
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-26
-
ISSN:2152-0801
-
Container-title:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev.
Author:
Richards Steven,Vassalos Michael
Abstract
South Carolina livestock producers are expanding their operations to include local meat sales, with a sizeable number of farmers entering the market for the first time. Little is known about South Carolina’s local meat consumers and their buying preferences. This study aims to identify the demographic traits of local meat consumers, their preferred local meat product attributes, their desired purchasing locations, and a range of prices consumers are willing to pay for local meat. This study surveyed 1,048 South Carolina meat consumers. Of these survey respondents, 741 had consumed local meat products within the last 12 months and 307 had not. Results indicate that local meat consumers tend to be younger, reside in larger households, have higher household incomes, and have greater educational attainment. They also may be more likely to be long-term residents of South Carolina. These consumers are willing to pay a 1% to 24% premium for local meats to be eaten at home and US$1.00 to US$1.99 more per entrée for local meats at a restaurant. The most desirable attributes of local meat are hormone-free, all-natural, no antibiotics, and grass-fed. The most popular buying locations are the grocery store, directly from farms, farmers markets, butcher shops, and online ordering. Most consumers are unwilling to drive more than 20 miles (32 km) to purchase local meat. The study also uncovered barriers to consumers’ willingness to purchase (or purchase more) local meats: product unavailability, high prices, food safety concerns, convenience, and ease of preparation.
Publisher
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
Reference112 articles.
1. An examination of consumer willingness to pay for local products;Adalja;Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,2015 2. Adams, D. C., & Adams, A. E. (2008, July 27-29). Availability, attitudes, and willingness to pay for local foods: Results of a preliminary survey [Paper presentation]. 2008 Annual Meeting, American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, United States. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.6237 3. Adu-Gyamfi, A., Omer, R. I., Bartlett, J. R., Tackie, D. N. O., Perry, B. J. (2016). Assessing Florida consumer attitudes and beliefs about locally or regionally produced livestock and products. Professional Agricultural Workers Journal, 4(1), Article 11. https://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj/vol4/iss1/11 4. Agabriel, J., Faure, B., Lebreton, F. X., Lherm, M., Micol, D., Garcia-Launay, F., Pradel, P., Angeon, V., & Martin, B. (2014). La race bovine Salers : un atout pour le développement de son territoire d'origine par son identité forte et des produits qualifiés [Salers: The potential of a local cattle breed to contribute to the development of its home territory through its image and identified products]. Cahiers Agricultures, 23(2), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2014.0687 5. Andreatta, S., & Wickliffe, W. (2002). Managing farmer and consumer expectations: A study of a North Carolina farmers market. Human Organization, 61(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.61.2.a4g01d6q8djj5lkb
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Informational Nudges to Promote Preferences for Goat Meat;Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics;2024-05-30
|
|