Participatory breeding in organic systems: Experiences from maize case studies in the United States
-
Published:2024-03-06
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-14
-
ISSN:2152-0801
-
Container-title:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev.
Author:
Mujjabi ChristopherORCID, Bohn MartinORCID, Wander MichelleORCID, Ugarte CarmenORCID
Abstract
Participatory breeding and crop selection can satisfy the needs of underserved groups of farmers (e.g., organic producers, farmers producing specialty grain for niche markets) neglected by the modern global seed industry. Participatory research methods that value local knowledge and facilitate the active involvement of producers, researchers, and other actors involved in the agri-food system are tactics that can help us achieve sustainable agriculture. Interest in the use of participatory methods to increase the value of U.S. land-grant universities to society has grown rapidly during the last decade. Interest includes re-engagement in the development of maize hybrids that perform well in a diverse range of heterogeneous growing environments and that are better suited for sustainability-minded producers, buyers, and consumers. Systems-based breeding aimed at protecting the environment and providing food, fiber, and energy while considering equity issues, has been proposed as a way to overcome the shortcomings of privatized approaches. In this article, we consider recent projects that use collaborative methods for hybrid maize breeding, cultivar testing, and genetic research to develop, identify, and deliver traits associated with crop performance, quality, and sustainability. Three case studies consider the efforts focused on developing non-GMO varieties for organic and specialty markets. We find that, unlike many successful efforts focused on the improvement of other crops, there are few promising models for participatory breeding of hybrid maize. Even though many projects have sought to involve stakeholders with a variety of methods, all have struggled to meaningfully engage farmers in maize hybrid improvement. Still, our reflection of case studies calls for systems-based breeding and suggests a path forward. This route would seek to address the needs, perspectives, and values of a broader range of actors participating in the food system by leveraging technologies and infrastructure in service of the public. Land-grant universities are well positioned to play a crucial role in coordinating efforts, facilitating partnerships, and supporting breeding programs that satisfy societal wants that include health, equity, and care.
Publisher
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
Reference48 articles.
1. Adam, K. L. (2005). Seed production and variety development for organic systems. ATTRA. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=94700c8b5c06e992468997ac1677b234aef9f173 2. AlKhalifah, N., Campbell, D. A., Falcon, C. M., Gardiner, J. M., Miller, N. D., Romay, M. C., Walls, R., Walton, R., Yeh, C.-T., Bohn, M., Bubert, J., Buckler, E. S., Ciampitti, I., Flint-Garcia, S., Gore, M. A., Graham, C., Hirsch, C., Holland, J. B., Hooker, D., … Lawrence-Dill, C. J. (2018). Maize genomes to fields: 2014 and 2015 field season genotype, phenotype, environment, and inbred ear image datasets. BMC Research Notes, 11, Article 452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3508-1 3. Ashby, J. A. (2009). The impact of participatory plant breeding. In S. Ceccarelli, E. P. Guimarães, & E. Weltzien (Eds.), Plant breeding and farmer participation (pp. 649-671). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/i1070e/i1070e.pdf#page=662 4. Bhargava, A., & Srivastava, S. (2019). Advantages and cost of participatory plant breeding. In Participatory plant breeding: Concept and applications (pp. 87-107). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7119-6_4 5. Brush, S. B. (2004). Farmers' bounty: Locating crop diversity in the contemporary world [Online ed.]. Yale Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300100495.001.0001
|
|