Affiliation:
1. Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
2. Department of Pathology, SRIHER, Chennai, India.
3. Department of Plastic Surgery, SRIHER, Chennai, India.
Abstract
Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (PEH) is a benign condition marked by reactive epithelial proliferation seen in response to various insults like trauma, infection, persistent inflammation and neoplasia. In this report, we discuss a case of a 35-year-old man who presented with a perineal swelling, later turned into a non-healing ulcer, first diagnosed as PEH. Still, after clinical suspicion, a deeper biopsy was conducted, confirming the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma and directing treatment appropriately.
Non-healing perineal lesions are not uncommon. Most of the lesions turn out to be Squamous Cell Carcinoma. But, if the histopathological picture suggests Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia, it is vital to consider the limitations of the biopsy, and a solid clinicopathological correlation is required to look aggressively for underlying Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Due to the benign nature of PEH, most cases are treated via excision biopsy, while grafts or flaps are occasionally required to restore severe tissue defects.
It is therefore crucial to rule out and distinguish this condition from other benign and malignant conditions, as the treatment and prognosis differ widely. It is of utmost importance to sample the base of the lesion, analyze multiple sections, and consider clinical data to ensure an accurate diagnosis.
Publisher
Asian Medical Press Limited
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference20 articles.
1. Chakrabarti S, Chakrabarti PR, Agrawal D, Somanath S: Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: a clinical entity mistaken for squamous cell carcinoma. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014; 7(4): 232-234.
2. Scott G, Chen KT, Rosai J: Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in Spitz nevi. A possible source of confusion with squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989; 113(1): 61-63.
3. Gacek MR, Gacek RR, Gantz B, et al: Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia versus squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1998; 108(4 Pt 1): 620-623.
4. Galan A, Ko CJ: Langerhans cells in squamous cell carcinoma vs. pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia of the skin. J Cutan Pathol 2007; 34(12): 950-952.
5. Nayak VN, Uma K, Girish HC, et al: Pseudoepitheliomatous Hyperplasia in Oral Lesions: A Review. J Int Oral Health 2005; 7(9): 148-152.