Comparing the Effect of Dienogest and OCPS on Pain and Quality of Life in Women with Endometriosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Author:

Niakan Gelareh1ORCID,Rokhgireh Samaneh2,Ebrahimpour Majid3,Mehdizadeh Kashi Abolfazl2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Resident of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2. Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3. Psychology Department, Islamic Azad University, Qaenat Branch, Qaenat, Iran

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that adversely affects women’s quality of life (QOL). We aimed to compare the effect of dienogest and oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) on pain and QOL in women with endometriosis. Methods: This randomized double-blind trial was conducted at Rasoul-e-Akram hospital, affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from March 2018 to March 2020, on women with severe endometriosis confirmed by laparoscopic surgery. Ninety patients were randomly given either dienogest (Vissane 2 mg tablet; n = 30), or OCPs (LD; n = 30), or placebo (n = 30) daily for 12 weeks. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patient’s pain including dyspareunia, dysuria, dyschezia, and pelvic pain. The secondary outcome was considered as a change in patients’ QOL score. Results: The mean age of population was 32.99 ± 7.1 years. There was no significant difference in the three groups regarding baseline characteristics. Pelvic pain was significantly reduced, while the effect of medication on dysuria and dyschezia was not significant. The overall QOL score between the control and dienogest (P = 0.02) and OCPs groups (P = 0.001) was significantly different; however, the difference was not significant between the two intervention groups Conclusion: The finding of the present study revealed that there is no difference in the efficacy of dienogest and OCPs in management of pain and the QOL. But there was a significant difference between the placebo and intervention groups.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3