Academic Health Science Centres as Vehicles for Knowledge Mobilisation in Australia? A Qualitative Study

Author:

Edelman Alexandra1ORCID,Clay-Williams Robyn2ORCID,Fischer Michael3,Kislov Roman45ORCID,Kitson Alison6ORCID,McLoughlin Ian7,Skouteris Helen89ORCID,Harvey Gillian1011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

2. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

3. Centre for Sustainable Human Resource Management and Wellbeing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

4. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

5. The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

6. Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

7. Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

8. Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

9. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

10. Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

11. Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing investments in academic health science centres (AHSCs) in Australia and an expectation that they will serve as vehicles for knowledge translation and exchange, there is limited empirical evidence on whether and how they deliver impact. The aim of this study was to examine and compare the early development of four Australian AHSCs to explore how they are enacting their impact-focused role. Methods: A descriptive qualitative methodology was employed across four AHSCs located in diverse health system settings in urban and regional locations across Australia. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 15 academic, industry and executive board members of participating AHSCs. The analysis combined inductive and deductive elements, with inductive categories mapped to deductive themes corresponding to the study aims. Results: AHSCs in Australia are in an emergent state of development and are following different pathways. Whilst varied approaches to support research translation are apparent, there is a dominant focus on structure and governance, as opposed to action-oriented roles and processes to deliver strategic goals. Balancing collaboration and competition between partners presents a challenge, as does identifying appropriate ways to evaluate impact. Conclusion: The early stage of development of AHSCs in Australia presents an important opportunity for formative learning and evaluation to optimise their enactment of knowledge mobilisation processes for impact.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health(social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3